Monitoring chilling injury: A comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, post‐chilling growth and visible symptoms of injury in Zea mays

Abstract

Changes in chlorophyll fluorescence emission from maize (Zea mays L. cv. Northern Belle) seedlings chilled at 1.5°C in the dark for 3–30 h were compared with the ability of plants to resume growth in the immediate post‐chilling period and with the development of visible symptoms of injury to the leaves. During chilling, the maximal rate of increase of the induced chlorophyll fluorescence rise. FR, was measured on secondary leaf tissue. FR decreased exponentially, at approximately the same rate in plants grown and chilled in hydroponic pots, in leaves detached from similar plants and in plants that were removed from the hydroponic pots and laid on wet filter paper adjacent to the detached leaves. The half‐fall time for FR in the 3 treatments was 7.8 ± 1.3 h, 8.6 ± 0.6 h and 8.8 ± 1.0 h, respectively. Following seedling removal from 1.5°C and return to 25/15°C, relative growth rates were determined from daily measurements of plant fresh weight gain. Compared with non‐chilled seedlings, plants chilled for 3 h and longer showed depressed rates of growth. Inhibition of growth in the immediate post‐chilling period (0–27 h) was linearly related to the duration of the chilling period and had a high positive correlation with the decrease in chlorophyll fluorescence (linearly related to log FR) sustained during the chilling exposure. Visible symptoms of chilling injury developed during the post‐chilling period on seedlings chilled for longer than 3 h. The decrease in log FR during chilling was also linearly correlated with the severity of visual symptoms of chilling injury expressed in the post‐chilling period. It is concluded that the extent of chilling injury in maize can be rapidly and non‐destructively assessed from measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence.