Abstract
Justice Felix Frankfurter once observed, “The history of American freedom is, in no small measure, the history of procedure.” Professor Henry Monaghan’s 1970 article highlighted for me the deft adjustment of procedural rules by the Supreme Court of the United States to protect substantive speech interests. As other scholars confirm, “procedure is power.” Early on in my legal studies, I had a rudimentary understanding of procedure’s power to govern how our rights are enforced and protected. But it wasn’t until I read Professor Monaghan’s article that I came to more fully appreciate the Court’s calibration of procedural levers to safeguard substantive liberties.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
