Abstract

Total genomic DNA from 31 available Gossypium species, three subspecies and one interspecific hybrid, were analysed to evaluate genetic diversity by RAPD, using 45 random decamer primers. A total of 579 amplified bands were observed, with 12.9 bands per primer, of which 99.8% were polymorphic. OPJ-17 produced the maximum number of fragments while the minimum number of fragments was produced with primer OPA-08. Cluster analysis by the unweighted paired group method of arithmetic means (UPGMA) showed six main clusters. Cluster ’A’ consisted of two species and one subspecies of the A-genome, with a 0.78–0.92 Nei’s similarity range. Cluster B, composed of all available tetraploid species and one interspecific hybrid, showed the same sister cluster. Nei’s similarity ranged from 0.69 to 0.84. The B-genome formed the UPGMA sister cluster to the E-genome species. Cluster ’C’ consisted of five Gossypium species of which three belong to the B-genome, with Nei’s similarity values of 0.81 to 0.86. Although there was considerable disagreement at lower infra-generic ranks, particularly among the D- genome (diploid New World species) and C-genome (diploid Australian species) species. The sole F-genome species Gossypium longicalyx was resolved as a sister group to the D-genome species. Gossypium herbaceum and G. herbaceum Africanum showed the maximum Nei’s similarity (0.93). Minimum similarity (0.29) was observed between Gossypium trilobum and Gossypium nelsonii. The average similarity among all studied species was 50%. The analysis revealed that the interspecific genetic relationship of several species is related to their centre of origin. As expected, most of the species have a wide genetic base range. The results also revealed the genetic relationships of the species Gossypium hirsutum to standard cultivated Gossypium barbadense, G. herbaceum and Gossypium arboreum. These results correspond well with previous reported results. The level of variation detected in closely related genotypes by RAPD analysis indicates that it may be a more efficient marker than morphological marker, isozyme and RFLP technology for the construction of genetic linkage maps.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.