Abstract
In the case of concrete built into a structure, the static secant modulus of elasticity (Ec,s) is often estimated based on its dynamic value (Ed) measured by the ultrasonic pulse velocity method instead of direct tests carried out on drilled cores. Meanwhile, the prevailing equations applied to estimate Ec,s often overlook the impact of concrete moisture. This study aimed to elucidate the moisture impact across two normal-weight structural concretes differing in compressive strength (51.6 and 71.4 MPa). The impact of moisture content was notably more evident only for the weaker concrete, according to dynamic modulus measurements. In other cases, contrary to the literature reports and expectations, this effect turned out to be insignificant. These observations may be explained by two factors: the relatively dense and homogeneous structure of tested concretes and reduced sensitivity of Ec,s measurements to concrete moisture condition compared to Ed measurements obtained using the ultrasonic method. Additionally, established formulas to estimate Ec,s were verified. The obtained modulus results tested under different moisture conditions of normal-weight concretes were also compared with those of lightweight aggregate concretes of identical volume compositions previously obtained in a separate study.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
