Modus Ponens and Moral Realism

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessModus Ponens and Moral RealismG. F. SchuelerG. F. Schueler Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 98, Number 3Apr., 1988 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/292967 Views: 28Total views on this site Citations: 33Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Malte Willer, Christopher Kennedy Assertion, expression, experience, Inquiry 34 (Dec 2020): 1–37.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1850338Neil Sinclair The Naturalistic Fallacy, 14 (Nov 2018).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316717578Derek Baker Expression and Guidance in Schroeder’s Expressivist Semantics, Erkenntnis 83, no.44 (Jul 2017): 829–852.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9916-0John Eriksson Noncognitivism: From the Vienna Circle to the Present Day, (Dec 2017): 591–606.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139519267.046Malte Willer Advice for Noncognitivists, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (Jul 2016): 174–207.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12160Caj Strandberg Can the Embedding Problem Be Generalized?, Acta Analytica 30, no.11 (Jul 2014): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-014-0232-xDerek Baker and Jack Woods How Expressivists Can and Should Explain Inconsistency, Ethics 125, no.22 (Jun 2015): 391–424.https://doi.org/10.1086/678371Mark Douglas Warren , Philosophical Studies 172, no.1111 ( 2015): 2859.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0447-8John Cantwell Unity and Autonomy in Expressivist Logic, Dialectica 68, no.33 (Sep 2014): 443–457.https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-8361.12072Nicholas Smyth Resolute Expressivism, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17, no.44 (Feb 2014): 607–618.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9495-yZed Adams Against Moral Intellectualism, Philosophical Investigations 37, no.11 (Jul 2013): 37–56.https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12025Robert Mabrito Are expressivists guilty of wishful thinking?, Philosophical Studies 165, no.33 (Aug 2012): 1069–1081.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-0003-8Michael Ridge Non-Cognitivism, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee137Ruth Weintraub Logic For Expressivists, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89, no.44 (Dec 2011): 601–616.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2010.525517Neil Sinclair Moral expressivism and sentential negation, Philosophical Studies 152, no.33 (Nov 2009): 385–411.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9484-5MICHAEL PENDLEBURY How to be a Normative Expressivist, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80, no.11 (Jan 2010): 182–207.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00315.xJeff Wisdom A Defense of Descriptive Moral Content, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 47, no.33 (Sep 2009): 285–300.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00095.xPatricia Marino ON ESSENTIALLY CONFLICTING DESIRES, The Philosophical Quarterly 59, no.235235 (Apr 2009): 274–291.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.570.xMark Schroeder How Expressivists Can and Should Solve Their Problem with Negation, Noûs 42, no.44 (Nov 2008): 573–599.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.00693.xMark Schroeder What is the Frege-Geach Problem?, Philosophy Compass 3, no.44 (Jul 2008): 703–720.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00155.x Bibliography, (Jan 2008): 411–440.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757031.biblioAndy Egan Quasi-realism and fundamental moral error1, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85, no.22 (Jun 2007): 205–219.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400701342988DAVID ALM Non-Cognitivism and Validity, Theoria 73, no.22 (Oct 2008): 121–147.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2007.tb01194.xPatricia Marino Expressivism, Logic, Consistency, and Moral Dilemmas, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9, no.55 (Nov 2006): 517–533.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-9034-6James Gordon Finlayson Habermas's Moral Cognitivism and the Frege-Geach Challenge, European Journal of Philosophy 13, no.33 (Dec 2005): 319–344.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2005.00232.xDaniel Nolan, Greg Restall, Caroline West Moral fictionalism versus the rest, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83, no.33 (Sep 2005): 307–330.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400500191917Mark van Roojen EXPRESSIVISM, SUPERVENIENCE AND LOGIC, Ratio 18, no.22 (Jun 2005): 190–205.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2005.00283.x by Sophia R. Moreau Reasons and Character Moreau, Ethics 115, no.22 (Jul 2015): 272–305.https://doi.org/10.1086/426306Sergio Tenenbaum Quasi-Realism's Problem of Autonomous Effects, The Philosophical Quarterly 53, no.212212 (Jul 2003): 392–409.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00320JAMES LENMAN Disciplined Syntacticism and Moral Expressivism, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66, no.11 (Jan 2003): 32–57.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00242.xMark Van Roojen Humean and Anti-Humean Internalism About Moral Judgements, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65, no.11 (Jul 2002): 26–49.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00181.xNicholas Unwin Quasi-Realism, Negation and the Frege-Geach Problem, The Philosophical Quarterly 49, no.196196 (Jul 1999): 337–352.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00146Stefan Sencerz Moral facts and the problem of justification in ethics, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73, no.33 (Sep 1995): 368–388.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409512346711