Abstract
Background:Our previous three-dimensional finite element analysis found that posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in the modified tibial tunneling placement (MTT, 10 mm inferior and 5 mm lateral to the PCL anatomical insertion) could reduce the peak stress of the graft and may reduce the killer turn. The purpose of the current study was to compare the biomechanical results between MTT and traditional tibial tunneling technique (TTT, PCL anatomical insertion) during transtibial PCL reconstruction.Methods:Fifty-six 3D-printed tibia models and fresh mature porcine flexor digitorum tendons were studied. The PCL reconstruction specimens were randomly divided into TTT group and MTT group based on tibial tunnel placement. A 50 to 300 N cyclic loading was applied using a material testing system. Each specimen completed 2000 cycles at a rate of 200 mm/min and a loading frequency of 80 cycles/min. Load–displacement curves, failure mode, and graft displacement were recorded. Mean maximum contact pressure was measured using a pressure-sensitive film. After cyclic loading test, the surviving grafts were randomly assigned to load-to-failure group or Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) group. Ultimate failure load and the appearance of graft abrasion were recorded and analyzed.Result:During the cyclic loading test, 3 samples in the TTT group, and 2 in the MTT group were excluded because of the graft pullout during the test. Mean maximum contact pressure of killer turn was 9.30 ± 0.29 MPa in the TTT group and 7.27 ± 0.25 MPa in MTT group (P < .05). Mean graft displacement was 4.54 ± 0.23 mm in the TTT group and 3.37 ± 3.56 mm in the MTT group (P < .05). Maximum failure load was 1886.0 ± 41.83 N in the TTT group and 2019.30 ± 20.10 N in the MTT group (P < .05). The SEM analysis showed heavy abrasion and fiber discontinuity in graft in the TTT group, while it showed slight abrasion and fiber arrangement disorders in the MTT group.Conclusions:The MTT PCL reconstruction significantly reduced stress concentration and graft abrasion as compared with the TTT PCL reconstruction, and it may be a better choice for the reduction of “killer Turn” effect during transtibial PCL construction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.