Abstract

Background: Sport Education and ‘Tactical decision learning model’ (TDLM) are two curriculum models used by physical education teachers in France to help students in the development of a tactical intelligence of game play in the didactics of team sports. Purpose: Identify prototypic configurations of play in the sense that they represent an original model, archetype of a model that reproduces itself. Participants and setting: We conducted this research with three age groups of secondary school students (grade 6, 11/12 years old; grade 9, 14/15 years old; and grade 12, 17/18 years old). The team sport selected was soccer with a 4 vs. 4 player format. Research design: Based on the video observation of a final sample of 188 sequences of play having led to a shot at goal or a goal, we considered three categories of criteria combined and came up with eight prototypic configurations of play often displayed by novice players. Data collection: The following observational categories were retained: (1) location of ball recovery with reference to the position on the field: high ball recovery (in the opponents’ side of the pitch); recovery in the middle area of the pitch; low recovery (in one's own side of the pitch); (2) location of recovery with reference to the position within the effective (occupied) play-space (EP-S): recovery at the front of the EP-S; recovery at the rear or in the middle area of the EP-S; and (3) selection of play after recovery of the ball: (a) ball exchange with a teammate (long pass, short pass, number of passes); and (b) dribble. Findings: Eight prototypic offensive configurations of play are presented and a related didactical model is discussed. Conclusions: In team sports with a constructivist approach, such modelling, models and efficient-action rules imply a construction by students. It requires an evolution of the various concepts involved, a progressive integration, step-wise or level-wise, to a thinking process. For this purpose, in the teaching/learning system in team sports, we propose to switch from Teaching Games for Understanding to Learning Games through Understanding.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.