Abstract
This study compares the carbon dioxide capture efficiency of packed bed (PB) column and rotating packed bed (RPB) absorber by mono-ethanolamine (MEA) solution. Carbon dioxide absorption experiments were carried out in laboratory scale packed bed column and rotating packed bed at various lean carbon dioxide loadings of the MEA solution They were modelled successfully by an ASPEN Plus advanced customer model (ACM). Using these models, we found that substantial savings of packing volume can be achieved using a series arrangement of RPB and PB for the CO2 capture process using 30wt% MEA solution.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
