Abstract
The highlighting of the deepest identity of Futsal is through putting into perspective the framework chosen for this new look, the driving praxeology, and the sports game is before all a body of rules. This playful contract, which is basically a social contract, determines for the most part, the internal logic that is specific to each game. The issue is to observe how the individual acting and deciding, immersed in this set of constraints, operates its practical choice and develops its own motor strategies. In short, this stability that characterizes all sports games reveals a crucial trait of their intelligibility. Besides, “a sports specialty was likely to appeal to a group only if its internal logic is consistent to the habitus of this group”, emphasizes Parlebas (1981) [1]. This is to promote a new interpretation of sports. What seems to be mathematical or sociological studies companies on the game? The interest which was granted him does simply not honor. The major challenge will be to reconsider the sports game in terms of specificity which calls for original research and serious methodologies in a new light. Through time, we can realize that an avalanche of theories about the game appeared, each based on the “imperfections” of the other without however the solution she claimed to hold.
Highlights
The highlighting of the deepest identity of Futsal is through putting into perspective the framework chosen for this new look, the driving praxeology, and the sports game is before all a body of rules
We see based on the statistical results shown in Table 2; KHI2 is very significant at P < 0.001, which is in favor of the two Futsals which shows a significant difference at the level of the different variables of the motor translations during competitive situations of confrontation
Comparative analysis of motor translations during competitive situations of affrontement.des three Futsals according to the variation of the hang of the game
Summary
We find the different games of our childhood: the ball to the prisoner, the ball sitting (Parlebas, 1986) [2] This distinction between institutional and traditional game is capital and relates to pedagogical and sociological considerations. The coding that makes the game is basically defined by a system of rules that specifies the operating conditions. Sport can adopt this definition of the sports game but would add two decisive distinctive criteria, competition and institutionalization. A physical practice cannot be regarded as a sport outside a competitive framework It is precisely this context that makes a daily run or a simple swimming cannot be called “sport”. The agreed definition exceeds looking for a Genesis to be based on identifiable and objectively quantifiable parameters
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
