Abstract
Many patterns of phenotypic evolution are described and analyzed from a phenotype space perspective. In most instantiations of phenotype space, the set of phenotypic variants is endowed with a metric structure derived from some measure of geometric, anatomical, or structural similarity among variants: a notion of phenotypic distance is defined and phenotypic variants are spatially organized accordingly. While these approaches are successful in addressing many biological questions, metric topologies so defined are limited in their ability to shed mechanistic light on phenotypic evolution, because they do not embody in their definition the processes underlying the phenotype’s variability. Building on results from theoretical biochemistry and phenotype landscape theory, it is proposed to complement this default metric structure with an additional structure that considers the factors involved in the expression of the phenotype of interest. This shift in perspective leads to a genetic or developmental representation of the phenotype from which emerges a notion of evolutionary accessibility among phenotypic variants. We illustrate how accessibility structure strengthens the explanatory power of phenotype space by helping characterize constraints on variation and how these constraints may interfere or align with external selective pressures in the course of phenotypic evolution.
Highlights
An important but challenging aim of evolutionary biology and paleobiology is to determine the factors that have driven and structured past and current patterns of phenotypic evolution
We illustrate the use of the notion of accessibility suggested above with a few examples and discuss its implications for the structure and representation of phenotype spaces and morphospaces
In all the example functions, the set of possible phenotypic variants conveniently fall within the range [0,1] so that all morphospace representations are comparable
Summary
An important but challenging aim of evolutionary biology and paleobiology is to determine the factors that have driven and structured past and current patterns of phenotypic evolution. The state of adaptation and the evolvability of a phenotype at a given life stage is determined by the interplay of direct and indirect forms of external selection and lineage-specific variational constraints (including internal selection) (e.g., Fusco, 2001; Pigliucci, 2007; Schwenk & Wagner, 2004; Wake & Larson, 1987). Probing the relative prevalence of these determinants in the evolutionary history of a phenotype requires a phylogenetic hypothesis to place the pattern in a historical and comparative framework, testable or plausible adaptive scenarios for the sorting and maintenance of variants, and a model of the developmental system producing the phenotype.
Paper version not known (
Free)
Published Version
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have