Abstract

Support carbon corrosion has been identified as a major degradation source in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Start-up/Shutdown (SUSD) [1], fuel starvation [1], and voltage reversal [2] are widely-known conditions that can trigger non-negligible carbon corrosion in the anode or cathode. SUSD carbon corrosion is associated with current reversal while there is no external load. As a comparison, fuel starvation due to nitrogen blanketing and/or water droplets in an operating cell also can result in similar current reversal. The region with current reversal, i.e., a proton flux from the cathode to the anode, features extremely severe hydrogen depletion in the anode and occurrence of carbon corrosion in the opposite cathode. Differently, the voltage reversal occurs in one or a few cells (not all) in a stack. Those cells show negative cell voltages under extended reversal, but the overall current is flowing as usual thanks to the other normal cells in the stack. The voltage reversal leads to carbon corrosion in the anode, as compared to carbon corrosion in the cathode for current reversal. The local potential for carbon corrosion could be much more severe in an extended voltage reversal than that in SUSD.This paper/presentation will elucidate the fundamental differences of these three carbon corrosion scenarios with model simulation and analysis. The models [3, 4] will also be used to perform comprehensive parametric studies, aiming to understand the impacts from key design and operating parameters including pseudo-capacitance, selective oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysis, reactant gas flow rate, temperature, membrane hydration state, and current load drawn from the stack. It is anticipated to shed light on the otherwise confusing carbon corrosion scenarios in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell and the fundamental ideas for alleviation strategies. For example, in the fuel starvation induced carbon corrosion, the simulation indicates that the decreasing cell voltage due to diluted hydrogen concentration appears to limit the local potential in the cathode and associated carbon corrosion. In the SUSD carbon corrosion, pseudo-capacitance from Pt oxidation may raise another concern in parallel to carbon corrosion. In general, a reduced temperature or enhanced OER activity is helpful in reducing carbon corrosion. Figure 1

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.