Abstract

The primary objective of this work was to optimize red wine phenolic prediction with models built from wine ultraviolet–visible absorbance spectra. Three major obstacles were addressed to achieve this, namely algorithm selection, spectral multicollinearity, and phenolic evolution over time. For algorithm selection, support vector regression, kernel ridge regression, and kernel partial least squares regression were compared. For multicollinearity, the spectrum of malvidin chloride was used as an external standard for spectral adjustment. For phenolic evolution, spectral data were collected during fermentation as well as once a week for four weeks after fermentation had ended. Support vector regression gave the most accurate predictions among the three algorithms tested. Additionally, malvidin chloride proved a useful standard for phenolic spectral transformation and isolation. As for phenolic evolution, models needed to be calibrated and validated throughout the aging process to ensure predictive accuracy. In short, red wine phenolic prediction by the models built in this work can be realistically achieved, although periodic model re-calibration and expansion from data obtained using known phenolic assays is recommended to maintain model accuracy.

Highlights

  • The phenolic content of wines produced form V. vinifera berries can vary widely for several reasons, including vineyard practices [1], cultivar [2,3], vineyard geography [3,4], vintage [5], and wine making practices [6]

  • Red wine phenolic prediction by the models built in this work can be realistically achieved, periodic model re-calibration and expansion from data obtained using known phenolic assays is recommended to maintain model accuracy

  • Phenolic quantitation is invaluable from a commercial perspective, for red wines that have a greater and more diverse phenolic content than wines made from white cultivars [7] due to the duration of skin contact during red wine production [6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The phenolic content of wines produced form V. vinifera berries can vary widely for several reasons, including vineyard practices [1], cultivar [2,3], vineyard geography [3,4], vintage [5], and wine making practices [6]. As wine phenolics possess similar chemical structures, they possess similar ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectra. For this reason, several methods aimed at isolating wine phenolics by class have been developed [8,9,10,11,12]. Analysis of phenolics using HPLC and mass spectrometry has been developed [13]. Several researchers have attempted to circumvent this necessity by implementing multivariate statistical analysis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.