Abstract

Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), a process in which changes in synaptic strength are determined by the relative timing of pre- and postsynaptic activity, has been studied and modeled by a number of researchers, but many questions still remain. It has been suggested that STDP involves a postsynaptic chemical network with stable states corresponding to long term potentiation (LTP) and long term depression (LTD). It is believed that the switching between these states is driven by the postsynaptic Ca2+ concentration, but the manner in which the Ca2+ dynamics is able to trigger either LTP or LTD, depending on the relative timing of pre- and postsynaptic activity remains unclear. We have investigated a model of STDP that combines (1) the tristable chemical network involving CaMKII and PP2A studied by Pi and Lisman [1], with (2) compartmental modeling of backpropagating action potentials (BPAPs), N-methyl D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), and voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs). In previous work we have studied how this model responds when a presynaptic pulse arrives either shortly before or shortly after a postsynaptic pulse (a BPAP), and shown how this model leads naturally to LTP when the presynaptic pulse arrives first, or LTD when the postsynaptic pulse arrives first, in agreement as found in experimental studies (e.g., [2] and [3]). The response to spike triplets and other more complex pre- and postsynaptic spike trains are also of interest. Experiments [4] have shown that the response to such multispike trains is not simply the sum of the responses to the component spike pairs. For example, the response to a spike triplet consisting of pre-post-presynaptic spikes is often not explained by the simple addition of the responses to a pre-post spike pair followed by a post-pre spike pair. Previous work has proposed only heuristic rules for such multispike responses. In this paper we describe the application of our model of STDP to multispike situations. Our model exhibits a non-additive response similar to that observed by Wang et al. [4], and gives insight into how this non-additivity arises from properties of the CaMKII/PP2A network.

Highlights

  • Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), a process in which changes in synaptic strength are determined by the relative timing of pre- and postsynaptic activity, has been studied and modeled by a number of researchers, but many questions still remain

  • We have investigated a model of STDP that combines (1) the tristable chemical network involving CaMKII and PP2A studied by Pi and Lisman [1], with (2) compartmental modeling of backpropagating action potentials (BPAPs), N-methyl D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), and voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs)

  • In previous work we have studied how this model responds when a presynaptic pulse arrives either shortly before or shortly after a postsynaptic pulse, and shown how this model leads naturally to long term potentiation (LTP) when the presynaptic pulse arrives first, or long term depression (LTD) when the postsynaptic pulse arrives first, in agreement as found in experimental studies (e.g., [2] and [3])

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), a process in which changes in synaptic strength are determined by the relative timing of pre- and postsynaptic activity, has been studied and modeled by a number of researchers, but many questions still remain. We have investigated a model of STDP that combines (1) the tristable chemical network involving CaMKII and PP2A studied by Pi and Lisman [1], with (2) compartmental modeling of backpropagating action potentials (BPAPs), N-methyl D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), and voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs).

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.