Model building by comparison: a combination of expert knowledge and computer automation.

Abstract

The CASP blinds trials (Critical Assessment of techniques for protein Structure Prediction) assess the accuracy of protein prediction that includes evaluation of comparative model building of protein structures. Comparative models of four proteins (T0001, T0003, T0017, and T0028) for CASP2 (held during 1996) were constructed using computer algorithms combined with visual inspection. Essentially the main-chain modelling involves construction of the target structure from rigid-body segments of homologues and loop fragments extracted from homologous and nonredundant databases. Side-chains were initially constructed by inheritance from the parent or from a rotamer library. Side-chain conformations were then refined using a novel mean field approach that includes solvation. Comparison of the models with the subsequently released X-ray structures identified the successes and limitations of our approach. The most problematic area is the quality of the sequence alignments between parent(s) and target. In this respect the overinterpretation of the conserved features within homologous families can be misleading. Several features of our approach have a positive effect on the accuracy of the models. For T0003, inspection correctly identified that a lower sequence identity parent provides the best framework for this model. Loop selection worked well where a homologous protein fragment was used, but that the use of nonredundant fragment library remains problematic for hinge movements and displacements in secondary structure elements relative to the parent. Side-chain refinement improved residue conformations relative to the initial model. Use of limited energy minimization improved the stereochemical quality of the model without increasing the RMS deviation. This study has identified methods that are effective and areas requiring further attention to improve model building by comparison.