Abstract

Biotrickling filters are one of the most widely used biological technologies to perform biogas desulfurization. Their industrial application has been hampered due to the difficulty to achieve a robust and reliable operation of this bioreactor. Specifically, biotrickling filters process performance is affected mostly by fluctuations in the hydrogen sulfide (H2S) loading rate due to changes in the gas inlet concentration or in the volumetric gas flowrate. The process can be controlled by means of the regulation of the air flowrate (AFR) to control the oxygen (O2) gas outlet concentration ([O2]out) and the trickling liquid velocity (TLV) to control the H2S gas outlet concentration ([H2S]out). In this work, efforts were placed towards the understanding and development of control strategies in biological H2S removal in a biotrickling filter under aerobic conditions. Classical proportional and proportional-integral feedback controllers were applied in a model of an aerobic biotrickling filter for biogas desulfurization. Two different control loops were studied: (i) AFR Closed-Loop based on AFR regulation to control the [O2]out, and (ii) TLV Closed-Loop based on TLV regulation to control the [H2S]out. AFR regulation span was limited to values so that corresponds to biogas dilution factors that would give a biogas mixture with a minimum methane content in air, far from those values required to obtain an explosive mixture. A minimum TLV of 5.9 m h−1 was applied to provide the nutrients and moisture to the packed bed and a maximum TLV of 28.3 m h−1 was set to prevent biotrickling filter (BTF) flooding. Control loops were evaluated with a stepwise increase from 2000 ppmv until 6000 ppmv and with changes in the biogas flowrate using stepwise increments from 61.5 L h−1 (EBRT = 118 s) to 184.5 L h−1 (EBRT = 48.4 s). Controller parameters were determined based on time-integral criteria and simple criteria such as stability and oscillatory controller response. Before implementing the control strategies, two different mass transfer correlations were evaluated to study the effect of the manipulable variables. Open-loop behavior was also studied to determine the impact of control strategies on process performance variables such as removal efficiency, sulfate and sulfur selectivity, and oxygen consumption. AFR regulation efficiently controlled [O2]out; however, the impact on process performance parameters was not as great as when TLV was regulated to control [H2S]out. This model-based analysis provided valuable information about the controllability limits of each strategy and the impact that each strategy can have on the process performance.

Highlights

  • Biogas is a valuable renewable energy source produced during organic matter fermentation in anaerobic digestors in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs)

  • Due to the packed-bed nature of biotrickling filters, bed clogging caused by S0 accumulation in the biotrickling filter (BTF) bed is the main drawback related with the industrial application of aerobic desulfurization

  • Results from the comparison of the kL,H2S as a function of trickling liquid velocity (TLV) of the two correlations are showed in Figure 3A, while Figure 3B shows the model predictions using both correlations studied, Billet and Schultes and Onda’s correlation, together with experimental data profiles of the BTF performance operated under Open Loop conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biogas is a valuable renewable energy source produced during organic matter fermentation in anaerobic digestors in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Biogas utilization in WWTPs would allow supplying, partially or entirely, their electricity and heating needs, turning these facilities into “net zero” energy consumers. Selection of the best biogas utilization pathway depends strongly on the methane (CH4) composition, and on the composition of other impurities such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) (0.1–2%), which must be removed to lengthen the lifespan of cogeneration engines [3,4]. According to the Biogas Utilization Handbook [4], engines manufacturers recommend limiting H2S below 10 ppmv in the biogas stream, while other references recommend value up to 1000 ppmv [5]. The exact value will be dictated by the specific characteristics of the engine manufacturer and operating conditions of the engine

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.