Abstract

BackgroundPharyngeal segmentation is a defining feature of vertebrate embryos and is apparent as a series of bulges found on the lateral surface of the embryonic head, the pharyngeal arches. The ancestral condition for gnathostomes is to have seven pharyngeal segments: jaw, hyoid, and five posterior branchial arches. However, within the sarcopterygians, the pharyngeal region has undergone extensive remodelling that resulted in a reduction in the number of pharyngeal segments, such that amniotes have only five pharyngeal arches. The aim of this study is to probe the developmental basis of this loss of pharyngeal segments.ResultsWe have therefore compared the development of the pharyngeal arches in an amniote, the chick, which has five segments, with those of a chondrichthyan, the catshark, which has seven segments. We have analysed the early phase of pharyngeal segmentation and we find that in both the most anterior segments form first with the posterior segments being added sequentially. We also documented the patterns of innervation of the pharynx in several vertebrates and note that the three most anterior segments receive distinct innervation: the first arch being innervated by the Vth nerve, the second by the VIIth and the third by the IXth. Finally, we have analysed Hox gene expression, and show that the anterior limit of Hoxa2 aligns with the second pouch and arch in both chick and catshark, while Hoxa3 is transiently associated with the third arch and pouch. Surprisingly, we have found that Hoxb1 expression is spatially and temporally dynamic and that it is always associated with the last most recently formed pouch and that this domains moves caudally as additional pouches are generated.ConclusionWe propose that the first three pharyngeal segments are homologous, as is the posterior limit of the pharynx, and that the loss of segments occurred between these two points. We suggest that this loss results from a curtailment of the posterior expansion of the pharyngeal endoderm in amniotes at relatively earlier time point, and thus the generation of fewer segments.

Highlights

  • Pharyngeal segmentation is a defining feature of vertebrate embryos and is apparent as a series of bulges found on the lateral surface of the embryonic head, the pharyngeal arches

  • There has been a loss of pharyngeal segmentation in the adult form as a result of the remodelling of the pharynx, which occurs during metamorphosis in amphibians and embryogenesis in amniotes

  • A more detailed examination of Discussion In the present study, we have attempted to address the route through which the reduction in the number of pharyngeal segments that occurred within the sarcopterygians, and which is evident in extant tetrapod embryos

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pharyngeal segmentation is a defining feature of vertebrate embryos and is apparent as a series of bulges found on the lateral surface of the embryonic head, the pharyngeal arches. Pharyngeal segmentation is a characteristic of all vertebrates During development it is first seen in the appearance of a series of bulges on the lateral surface of the head, the pharyngeal arches [1]. A general feature of gnathostomes is to have seven pharyngeal segments; jaw, hyoid, and five posterior branchial (gill-bearing) arches [2]. This arrangement represents the plesiomorphic state as this situation is observed in many chondrichthyans and all actinopterygians, and this arrangement is seen in sarcopterygians, such as the coelacanth Latimeria and the. The reduction in the number of pharyngeal segments and the loss of explicit segmentation in adult tetrapods clearly reflects the shift from respiration in water via gills to air breathing using lungs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.