Modality-specific spike identification in simultaneous magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography: a methodological approach.

Abstract

Epileptiform spikes may have a different morphology and signal-to-noise ratio in simultaneously recorded EEGs and magnetoencephalograms (MEGs) that may lead to differences in the identification of spikes if both the modalities are presented separately. Moreover, there are no criteria for MEG spikes. It is unknown to which extent the visual assessment of MEG data yields consistent and meaningful results. Nineteen patients were selected with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy who underwent whole-head simultaneous MEG/EEG. These data were split into MEG and EEG files and were assessed independently by three observers for the occurrence of spikes. Interobserver kappa values were calculated. A mean kappa value greater than 0.5 was taken as a criterion for the presence of unequivocal spikes. Index cases from the resulting four subgroups were studied further. One patient had unequivocal spikes in both modalities, one in EEG only, one in MEG only, and one did not show any unequivocal spike. Spikes on which at least two observers agreed were then subjected to a template match algorithm to test for equal morphology and distribution. Equal spikes were averaged and electrical and magnetic field maps were plotted. Unequivocal spikes were found in both MEG and EEG in one patient, in MEG only in two patients, in EEG only in two patients, and no spikes in either modality were seen in 14 patients. In the four index patients, MEG showed 50 to 80% more spikes than EEG. After averaging identical consensus spikes, MEG spikes revealed a concomitant spike in the EEG, but the reverse was not always true. Even in the patient with MEG and EEG spikes that met all selection criteria, simultaneous field maps showed unexpected inconsistencies. In most patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, there are no unequivocal spikes during MEG/EEG. In some cases, however, experienced electroencephalographers can identify MEG spikes reliably. Because of a better signal-to-noise ratio, more spikes could be identified in MEG than in EEG. Simultaneous MEG/EEG recordings do not simply ensure the best of both, but one modality may improve the identification of spikes in the other. In addition, different aspects of a complex source can be revealed. Our three-step approach to combined data ensures a reproducible selection of spikes for source modeling.