Abstract

Mobile technologies have changed the shape of learning for learners, society, and education providers. Consequently, mobile learning has become a core component in modern education. Nevertheless, introducing mobile learning systems does not automatically guarantee that learners will develop a positive behavioural intention to use it and therefore use it. Thus, acceptance-of-technology and system-success studies have increased. As yet, however, much of the research regarding understanding students’ behavioural intention to use mobile learning systems seems to suffer from several shortcomings. On top of that, there is no common cognitive theoretical foundation. This study introduces a theoretical framework that combines the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Information System (IS) Success Model. This integration resulted in three success measures and two acceptance constructs. The success measures included the following: a) information quality, b) system quality, and c) user satisfaction; whilst the following were the acceptance measures: a) effort expectancy, b) performance expectancy, and c) social influence. Further, this study introduces lecture attitude as a new construct that is believed to moderate students’ behavioural intention. The relationships between the different factors form the research hypotheses.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThere is a rapid change taking place to traditional learning methods[1]

  • Knowledge acquisition is no longer restricted to a certain place and time

  • The analysis shows that students behavioural intention to use a mobile learning system is greatly affected by their effort expectancy and performance eexpectancy, information and system satisfaction, information and system quality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a rapid change taking place to traditional learning methods[1]. Learning in the 21st century, or the digital age, is affected by the rapid development of information and communication technologies and the availability of low-cost mobile devices[2] (mobile laptops, tablets, smart phones, PDAs, etc.), and this has resulted in mobile devices becoming more pervasive. Mobile learning is not yet well defined in the literature due to the argument regarding whether to focus on the mobility of learners or devices. It is argued that mobile learning is defined from a technical perspective instead of through the consideration of pedagogical elements. Mobile learning is defined as the conducting of educational activities using a mobile device and wireless service in which both learner and device are mobile[3]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.