Abstract

High-quality interface between propellant and insulation is the strict requirement difficult to quantify in solid rocket motor. In this study, the mixed mode delamination process of propellant and insulation interface is considered in double cantilever sandwich beam (DCSB) and single lap-joint (SLJ) test. The PPR cohesive zone model (CZM) and bilinear CZM in ABAQUS are introduced in this mixed fracture progress. In order to implement the PPR model in ABAQUS, user subroutine user element (UEL) is programmed for the novel CZM. Two simple pure mode I and mode II fracture problems are designed to check the accuracy of the UEL, and the result of verification is excellent. DCSB and SLJ test and their corresponding results are used again in the same inverse analysis with the two typical effective displacement-based and potential-based CZM. Base on the results, a series discussion and some conclusions are made. The debonding progress of the propellant and insulation interface in DCSB and SLJ test are mixed mode. The PPR CZM is prior in simulation than the bilinear CZM in ABAQUS because the PPR CZM is much more flexible with changeable traction-separation shape. The real normal and tangential displacement at damage initiation shows the unreasonable change in bilinear CZM in ABAQUS under mixed mode fracture. The PPR CZM and bilinear CZM in ABAQUS are all thickness-dependent model. The real initial stiffness and the critical displacement in the bilinear CZM and the real maximum traction in PPR model are dependent on the thickness of cohesive element. The different thickness dependence of the two model is caused by the implementation method.

Highlights

  • The function of a solid rocket motor (SRM) is to deliver a thrust according to a predetermined program

  • We introduce the mixed mode cohesive zone model to realize the debonding process of the propellant and insulation interface in double cantilever sandwich beam (DCSB) and single lap-joint (SLJ) test considering the asymmetric material on both sides of the interface and the insufficiency in previous research

  • Typical potential-based PPR cohesive zone model (CZM) and effective displacement-based bilinear CZM in ABAQUS are utilized in this paper

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The function of a solid rocket motor (SRM) is to deliver a thrust according to a predetermined program. The premise of a vanishingly small fracture process zone (FPZ) relative to the sample characteristic size is often not satisfied in the practical application [9] Another alternative approach for the analysis of debonding is cohesive zone model (CZM) [10, 11]. In order to investigate the debonding simulation of the propellant and insulation interface, intrinsic CZM combining the typical experimental data is drawn up by Zhou et al [30] and Niu et al [31] for mode I and mode II fracture, respectively. A series conclusions are made according to the discussion

Cohesive Zone Model
Computational Implantation of PPR Potential-Based CZM
Figure 4
Findings
Tests and Discussion
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.