Mitral Valve Prolapse Imitating a Mass Lesion

Diagnosing Endocarditis: Get the Picture?!

Infective endocarditis: Perioperative management and surgical principles

Introduction: Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Conventionally, a repeat transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is necessary if the first TEE is negative, and there is high clinical suspicion. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of contemporary TEE for IE. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that with advancements in TEE imaging, including three-dimensional (3D) imaging, the diagnostic performance of TEE for IE would be improved. Methods: Patients who had two or more TEEs at our center, within 6 months, for evaluation of IE in 2011 (pre-3D imaging) and 2019 (post-3D imaging) were included. Patients not meeting the Duke criteria for IE (n=899) were excluded. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity of TEE to detect IE. TEE sensitivity was also compared among the different subtypes of IE (native valve, prosthetic valve, device-related, central line-related, and aortic prosthetic graft-related). Results: 242 patients were included: 70 in 2011 and 172 in 2019. In 2011, there were more smokers and a lower rate of pacing devices; otherwise, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, including intravenous drug use. The sensitivity of the initial TEE for IE was 85.7% in 2011, improving significantly to 95.3% in 2019 (p=0.01). The improved diagnostic performance in 2019 was mainly driven by the improved detection of prosthetic valve IE (70.8% vs. 93.7%, p=0.009). There were no significant differences for the other subtypes of IE (Figure). In 2019, patients had a higher rate of IE diagnosis within 15 days of index admission, which did not reach statistical significance (n=161, 93.6% vs. n=62, 88.6% in 2011, p=0.19). Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated that patients in 2019 had a higher rate of procedures for endocarditis (p=0.01). Conclusions: Contemporary TEE imaging including 3D technology improved the detection of IE on the initial TEE, mainly driven by improved detection of prosthetic valve IE.

Infective endocarditis: What are predisposing conditions in native valves?

Viridans group streptococci (VGS) have been previously linked to infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). The species identification of VGS is now available in clinical laboratories; however, it has not been examined in MVP IE. Therefore, we detailed the clinical profile, species designations, and antibiotic susceptibility of VGS isolates from patients with MVP IE. We retrospectively queried all adults with MVP and a definite or possible IE diagnosis seen at medical centers of the Mayo Clinic Enterprise from January 2009 to December 2021. Data, including clinical characteristics, comorbidities, microbiology, and outcomes, were extracted from electronic health records. VGS isolates from patients with MVP and IE were subclassified into mutans, salivarius, anginosus, sanguinis, and mitis groups. A total of 38 patients with MVP with IE due to streptococcal species were included. Overall, median age was 62.4 years and 32% of patients were females. The most prevalent comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (26%), hypertension (21%), heart failure (16%), and malignancy (16%). A total of (37%) patients presented with an embolic event at the time of their IE diagnosis, 27 (66%) required valve surgery, and no patient died within the hospital stay. The Streptococcus mitis group was the predominant (n=17, 45%) species designation; S. anginosus and S. sanguinis were identified in three (8%) each; S. mutans in two (5%); and S. salivarius in one (3%).Non-VGS streptococcal pathogens included S. agalactiae in three patients (8%), S. equi in two (5%), and S. dysgalactiae and S. bovis in one each (3%). VGS were identified in five (13%) patients, but species designation was not done. No penicillin resistance was identified among the isolates. The S. mitis group was the predominant species in our investigation. Continued evaluation of VGS species should be considered to profile the IE risk based on species identification.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is widely underdiagnosed or diagnosed after a major delay. The diagnosis is currently based on the modified DUKE criteria, where the only validated imaging technique is echocardiography, and remains challenging especially in patients with an implantable cardiac device. The aim of this study was to assess the incremental diagnostic role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with an implanted cardiac device and suspected IE. We prospectively analysed 27 consecutive patients with an implantable device evaluated for suspected device-related IE between January 2011 and June 2013. The diagnostic probability of IE was defined at presentation according to the modified DUKE criteria. PET/CT was performed as soon as possible following the clinical suspicion of IE. Patients then underwent medical or surgical treatment based on the overall clinical evaluation. During follow-up, we considered: lead cultures in patients who underwent extraction, direct inspection and lead cultures in those who underwent surgery, and a clinical/instrumental reevaluation after at least 6 months in patients who received antimicrobial treatment or had an alternative diagnosis and were not treated for IE. After the follow-up period, the diagnosis was systematically reviewed by the multidisciplinary team using the modified DUKE criteria and considering the new findings. Among the ten patients with a positive PET/CT scan, seven received a final diagnosis of "definite IE", one of "possible IE" and two of "IE rejected". Among the 17 patients with a negative PET/CT scan, four were false-negative and received a final diagnosis of definite IE. These patients underwent PET/CT after having started antibiotic therapy (≥48 h) or had a technically suboptimal examination. In patients with a cardiac device, PET/CT increases the diagnostic accuracy of the modified Duke criteria for IE, particularly in the subset of patients with possible IE in whom it may help the clinician manage a challenging situation.

Infective Endocarditis: how many ultrasonography studies are necessary to reach the diagnosis? A real world scenario (2008-2017)

Transesophageal Echocardiography in Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis

ACC/AHA 2008 Guideline Update on Valvular Heart Disease: Focused Update on Infective Endocarditis

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common disorder, occurring in 4% of the general population.1 It is associated with increased risk of infective endocarditis, and antibiotic prophylaxis is suggested in those high-risk patients who have systolic murmurs.2 The vast majority of cases involve the valve and its accessory apparatus. Herein, we present an unusual location of vegetation in a patient with MVP. A 45-year-old woman had been diagnosed with MVP 1 month before admission at our institution, after a grade III/VI pansystolic murmur with late systolic click was heard during a regular health checkup. Echocardiography illustrated myxomatous change and prolapse of the anterior mitral leaflet, with severe eccentric mitral regurgitation. Because of intermittent fever, left flank pain, and tender skin erythema of both feet, the patient visited our emergency department, where blood pressure 113/76 mm Hg, heart rate 126 bpm, and body temperature 39.5°C were noted. Blood analysis showed white blood cell count of 11 400/mm3, hemoglobin level of 9.7 g/dL, C-reactive …

Background and aimsIn the absence of classical features (fever, cardiac murmur, and peripheral vascular stigmata) the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) may be difficult. Current clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IE recommend the use of modified Duke criteria. Correct and prompt diagnosis of IE is crucial for the treatment and outcome of the patients.The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence and the individual value of each criterion of the modified Duke criteria in our patients with infective endocarditis.MethodsWe performed a prospective observational study between January 2008 – June 2014, in which we enrolled consecutive adult patients admitted for suspicion of IE to the Hospital of Infectious Diseases and at the Heart Institute . We used and extensive database in order to collect demographic data, laboratory and echocardiography results, evolution and outcome of the patients. Using the modified Duke criteria we identified 3 categories of IE: definite, possible and rejected. In order to evaluate the importance of each criterion in the diagnosis of IE we tested two hypotheses. First, we excluded each criterion from the final diagnosis and we counted how many cases felt into a lower category. Second, after adding each major and minor criterion, we tested how many cases would have been classifiable as definite IE.ResultsThe study included 241 adult patients with a mean age 58.16 years and sex ratio male/female 1.94. According to the modified Duke criteria 137 patients had definite IE, 79 patients had possible IE and 25 cases had rejected IE We had blood cultures positive IE in 109 cases and blood culture negative IE (BCNE) in 132 (71.21%) cases. Antibiotic treatment prior to blood culture was recorded in 152 (63.07%) patients. In the absence of the echocardiography major criterion, 43% of cases would become possible. After extraction of major microbiological criterion, only one third of definite cases would become possible. Minor criteria such as fever and predisposition contributed to the diagnosis only in 10% of cases. In the presence of vascular or immunological phenomena, or in the presence of minor microbiological criterion, half of the possible IE cases could become possible.ConclusionTwenty-years after their launch, the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of IE continue to be important tools. Low index of suspicion of IE and inappropriate use of antibiotics may have a great negative impact on the diagnosis of IE. Nowadays, the scarcity of classical Osler manifestations - bacteremia, fever and peripheral stigmata - makes the diagnosis of IE a challenge.

Mitral Valve Prolapse: Palpating the Pachyderm

An increase in the number and the complexity of cardiac surgery has brought on a rise in the proportion of healthcare-associated Infectious Endocarditis (IE), and as a result, today S. aureus is the most common causative pathogen for this condition. Clinical suspicion for IE should be raised in front of a patient with predisposing risk factors, a new heart murmur and/or vasculitic/embolic events. The Duke Criteria have been long used to diagnose IE. However, they underwent several changes in order to improve their sensitivity in the diagnosis of Q-fever IE and to decrease the size of the possible IE group. Our primary goal is to enhance the knowledge regarding the diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis. In acute IE, prior to beginning antibiotic therapy, at least three sets of blood cultures must be taken, ideally from three distinct sites, as determining the etiologic agent is of highest importance. The diagnosis of IE cannot be made based just on a single positive blood culture. To diagnose subacute IE, three to five sets of blood cultures must be drawn over the course of 24 hours. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains the preferred investigation when the diagnosis of IE is suspected. Transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is recommended when TTE is unremarkable but the suspicion is still high. A whole-body CT scan, an MRI, a cardiac CT, PET-CT, or radiolabeled leucocyte single-photon emission computed tomography may be helpful when TTE and TOE are inconclusive. Recommended empirical therapy for Native Valve Endocarditis (NVE) and late Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis (PVE) consists of IV Amoxicillin, Oxacillin and Gentamicin administered until blood culture results are available. If a patient is allergic to penicillin, IV Vancomycin and Gentamicin should be given. The recommended empirical antibiotic regimen for early PVE includes IV Vancomycin, Gentamicin, and Rifampin. Once the results of blood cultures are available, the treatment will depend on the isolated organism, its sensitivity to antibiotics, and whether it is an NVE or a PVE.

Introduction In developed countries, the incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) is up to 6 cases per 100,000 individuals and in-hospital mortality rates are reported to reach 30%. The diagnostic recommendations for IE have been revised in the new ESC guidelines emphasizing the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and advanced imaging techniques (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance [MR], positron emission tomography [PET] and white blood cell scintigraphy [WBC-SPECT]). Aims This research aims to investigate the practical applicability of established clinical guidelines in a real-world population with suspected IE. Methods We reviewed the hospital database from 06/2021 to 06/2023 using the international classification of disease codification (ICD-10) for IE. Only patients admitted to Cardiology or Cardiac Surgery departments were included. Diagnosis of IE was defined according to the modified Duke criteria. Firstly, we identified individuals in whom diagnosis was performed by clinical presentation, blood cultures and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Subsequently, we identified those who required further imaging diagnostic investigation. Results A total of 63 patients were included [mean age 64 ±14 years; 76% male (n=48)]. Native IE was diagnosed in 53 (84%) patients, prosthetic IE in 7 (11%) and cardiac implantable electronic devices-related IE in 3 (5%). A total of 26 (41%) patients had at least one predisposing risk factor, 48 (76%) presented with fever, 24 (38%) suffered an embolic event and 1 (2%) had an immunological phenomenon. Out of 49 positive blood cultures (78%), typical microorganisms consistent with IE were isolated in 25 (78%) of samples: 13 (34%) staphylococcus aureus, 10 (26%) oral streptococci, 9 (24%) enterococcus faecalis, 5 (13%) streptococcus gallolyticus and 1 (3%) HACEK group. Overall, in 22 (34%) patients, a definitive diagnosis of IE was established by means of clinical presentation, blood cultures and TTE. In the remaining, TEE was performed in 86% (n=36). Of those, a definite diagnosis was established in 52% (n=22). Brain and whole-body imaging upgraded the diagnosis from possible to definite in 3 (5%) patients. In the one patient in which a comprehensive clinical evaluation including TTE and TEE rejected IE, the diagnosis was ultimately established by means of PET. The median time from admission to the definite/possible diagnosis of IE was 6 (IQR 2-17) days. A total of 47 (75%) patients underwent surgery, with the most frequent indications being heart failure 46% (n=21) and uncontrolled infection 28% (n=13). Time from diagnosis to surgery was 10 (2-19) days, hospital length of stay was 45 (35-70) days and in-hospital mortality 21%. Conclusion Clinical presentation, blood cultures and TTE plus TEE established the definite or possible diagnosis of IE in most patients with suspected IE. Advanced imaging techniques allowed the establishment of definite diagnosis in only 6% of patients.

A Diagnosis of Endocarditis in a Patient With Suspected Vasculitis