Abstract

We propose a local feature descriptor based on moment. Although conventional scale invariant feature transform (SIFT)-based algorithms generally use difference of Gaussian (DoG) for feature extraction, they remain sensitive to more complicated deformations. To solve this problem, we propose MIFT, an invariant feature transform algorithm based on the modified discrete Gaussian-Hermite moment (MDGHM). Taking advantage of MDGHM’s high performance to represent image information, MIFT uses an MDGHM-based pyramid for feature extraction, which can extract more distinctive extrema than the DoG, and MDGHM-based magnitude and orientation for feature description. We compared the proposed MIFT method performance with current best practice methods for six image deformation types, and confirmed that MIFT matching accuracy was superior of other SIFT-based methods.

Highlights

  • The scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) was proposed by Lowe [1] to extract image features invariant to changes in image scale, rotation, illumination, viewpoint, and partial occlusion

  • This paper proposes MIFT, an modified discrete Gaussian-Hermite moment (MDGHM) based invariant feature transform where the MDGHM

  • To obtain better matching accuracy, we propose MIFT, an MDGHM based invariant in a deformed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) was proposed by Lowe [1] to extract image features invariant to changes in image scale, rotation, illumination, viewpoint, and partial occlusion. Kang [8] proposed a modified local discrete Gaussian-Hermite moment based. Junaid [9] proposed binarization of gradient orientation histograms to reduce storage and computational resources These SIFT based algorithms can improve feature extraction performance, they are all the different types of Gaussian based methods and, sensitive to complicated deformations, e.g., large illumination changes [10]. This paper proposes MIFT, an MDGHM based invariant feature transform where the MDGHM based pyramid was constructed using input image MDGHMs, in contrast to the Gaussian pyramid and DoG used in the first SIFT stage, and MDGHM based magnitude and orientation were used to calculate orientation and keypoint descriptors in the third and fourth SIFT stages rather than the original gradient method. This section reviews the conventional SIFT algorithm [1] and MDGHM [8]

Scale Invariant Feature Transform
Discrete Gaussian-Hermite Moment
Proposed MIFT Algorithm
Stage 1
Stage 3
Stage conventional SIFT
Experimental Results
Keypoint Matching Accuracy
Notes:Gradient
Evaluation
Performance Evaluation
Comparison defined in Comparison between between the theproposed proposedMIFT
MDGHM Parameter Effects on Performance
Method
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.