Abstract

In the field of engineering, automobile and aerospace components are manufactured based on the desired applications from the metal forming process. For producing better quality of both symmetry and asymmetry mechanical parts, understanding the material deformation and analytical representation of the material ductility behavior for the working material is necessary as the forming procedures carried out mostly in the warm processing conditions. In this work, the hot tensile test flow stress-strain data were utilized to construct the constitutive equation for describing AISI-1045 steel material hot deformation behavior, and the test conditions, such as deformation temperatures and strain rates were 750–950 ° C and 0.05–1.0 s − 1 , respectively. The surface morphology and elemental identification analysis were performed using the field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) coupled with the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping setup. In this work, the Arrhenius-type constitutive equation, including the strain compensation, was used to formulate the flow stress prediction model for capturing the material behavior. Besides, the Zener-Hollomon parameter was altered, employing incorporating the effect of strain rate and strain on the flow stress. The empirical model approach was employed to estimate the material model constants from the constitutive equation using the actual test measurements. The population metrics such as coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), sample standard deviation of the error (SSD), standard error of the regression (SER), coefficient of residual variation (CRV), and average absolute relative error (AARE) was employed to confirm the predictability of the proposed models. The computed results are discussed in detail, using numerical and graphical verification’s. From the graphical comparison, the flow stress-strain data achieved from the proposed constitutive model are in good agreement with the actual test measurements. The constitutive model prediction accuracy is found to be improved, like the prediction error range from 3.678% to 2.984%. This evidence proves to be feasible as the newly developed model displayed a significant improvement against the experimental observations.

Highlights

  • AISI-1045 steel is a medium carbon steel material that is extensively used for the automobile industry applications, owing to its mechanical properties

  • The results showed that the modified ZA model was more significant in representing the material deformation behavior compared with the test data than that of others

  • The temperature dependent surface morphology, and elemental identification analysis of AISI-1045 steel were carried out using the field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

AISI-1045 steel is a medium carbon steel material that is extensively used for the automobile industry applications, owing to its mechanical properties. The strain effects were incorporated into the constitutive equation to characterize the flow behavior in 42CrMo at elevated temperatures by Lin et al [24] They reported that including the strain compensation, the proposed model could predict the material behavior significantly under hot working conditions. Krishnan et al [28] reported a valuable outcome for the use of strain-rate compensation in the Z parameter for 9Cr-1Mo ferritic steel They found that the proposed methodology based on the modified Z parameter provided a better estimation of flow stress for most of the test combinations. This present research work aims to establish and devise the suitable constitutive flow stress model over a wide range of testing conditions to describe the AISI-1045 steel material flow behavior. The predictability of proposed models was validated against the experimental observations and discussed statistically by both numerical and graphical validation

Experiments
Microstructure Evaluation of AISI-1045 Medium Carbon Steel
Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Equation
Higher Order Polynomial Regression Model
Strain Compensation
Constitutive Model Verification
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.