Abstract
The microsatellite pathologic score has been proposed as a valuable tool to estimate the probability of a colorectal cancer having high microsatellite instability; however, this score has not been tested in serrated adenocarcinoma. Our aim was to evaluate microsatellite pathologic score in serrated adenocarcinoma, conventional carcinoma, and colorectal cancer with high microsatellite instability histologic features. Eighty-nine serrated adenocarcinoma and 81 matched conventional carcinomas were tested with microsatellite pathologic score, and the results were compared with those of 24 high microsatellite instability histologic features. Validation was performed by microsatellite instability analysis. Although all colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability histologic features rendered a more than 5.5 score, the microsatellite pathologic score performance was of lower rank in high microsatellite instability serrated adenocarcinoma because none of the cases scored above 5.5 (>77% probability of being high microsatellite instability). High microsatellite instability serrated adenocarcinoma shows pathologic features different from those observed in high microsatellite instability histologic features such as adverse prognostic histologic features at the invasive front. We describe a serrated adenocarcinoma subtype showing high microsatellite instability and some, but not all, high microsatellite instability histologic features that would not be detected if the microsatellite pathologic score cutoff is set at the highest rank. To increase microsatellite pathologic score sensitivity in serrated adenocarcinoma, we propose to set up a 2.1 cutoff score when faced by a right-sided colorectal cancer with serrated features.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.