Abstract
In the April issue of this Journal, C. van Tellingen presented a rather global survey of the historical development of ideas on the movement of the blood.1 We would like to briefly comment on Van Tellingen’s views on Michael Servetus and the latter’s non-existing historical relation to William Harvey’s true discovery of the circulation of the blood.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
