Abstract

This essay analyzes a patent litigation in Mexico. In this case, Transitory Article Twelve of the Mexican Industrial Property Act was applied to recognize a priority filing date seven years later than its original filing in Japan. The litigation involved several issues like the extension of the term of protection, and the alleged infringement by defendant after authorities had extended the term of the patent. There are several principles and concerns discussed, like the principle of patent independence, national treatment, and minimum term of protection, all of which are contained in the Paris Convention, Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and in the Patent Cooperation Treaty. Furthermore, this paper analyzes how the provisions on patent term adjustments contained in the new United States-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement would be problematic for Mexico.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.