Abstract
This report describes the lessons learned from a series of community-based studies of gynecological morbidity among young married women in Karnataka State, India. Women's self-reports of symptoms of illness were found to be responsive to the context of the interview and the nature of questioning. In particular, women appeared much readier to report symptoms to lay interviewers after being invited to undergo a clinical examination in the near future than they were if no examination were offered. Little consistency was found in the results obtained from interviews, clinical examinations, and laboratory tests. Apparently, no alternative exists to the collection of biological specimens for laboratory analysis when estimates of disease prevalence are needed. Use of generic health-related quality-of-life assessments is recommended for future surveys. Prospective studies will yield more valuable data on these topics than will cross-sectional surveys.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
