Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing PCSK9 monoclonal antibody versus ezetimibe/placebo in patients at high cardiovascular risk

Abstract

Background and aimsProprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9 mAbs) reduce circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by controlling the expression of LDL-receptor on the surface of hepatocytes. This meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the efficacy of PCSK9 mAbs on clinical and lipid-lowering outcomes. MethodsPubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until November 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared PCSK9 mAbs with ezetimibe or placebo in patients at high cardiovascular risk. ResultsTwenty eight RCTs with a total of 89,115 participants were included. Compared with placebo, PCSK9 mAbs significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.88, p < 0.00001). However, no difference was observed in occurring MACEs between PCSK9 mAbs and ezetimibe (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.20, p = 0.20). Secondary analyses show that PCSK9 mAbs were not superior to ezetimibe in preventing stroke (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.69, p = 0.20), myocardial infarction (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.90, p = 0.88), and cardiovascular death (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.43, p = 0.17). Compared with placebo, PCSK9 mAbs significantly reduced the incidence of stroke (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.86, p < 0.0001) and myocardial infarction (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.87, p < 0.00001), but not the risk of cardiovascular death (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.07, p = 0.45). As for lipid-lowering efficacy, PCSK9 mAbs markedly reduced percent change of LDL-C from baseline to week 12 and 24 compared to ezetimibe or placebo. ConclusionsIn patients at high cardiovascular risk, PCSK9 mAbs could effectively reduce MACEs, stroke, and myocardial infarction compared with placebo. However, PCSK9 mAbs were not superior to ezetimibe in preventing adverse cardiovascular events in our study; RCTs with long-term follow-up and cardiovascular events as the research endpoint are still needed.