Abstract

By writing the story of his life as a missionary in the Canadian North West twice, 40 years apart and in two different forms, John Hines provides the historian with an opportunity to consider the creative process in history by questioning why Hines’s perception of events varied. In the field journals, Hines wrote for himself and his employers. Forty years later, he faced different considerations. He wrote his autobiography to appeal to a reading audience conditioned to expect a product that conformed to an established genre of missionary biography. A different historical reality had emerged by 1915. Hines redefined events to match the emerged government policy and the anticipated future of Aboriginal peoples in Canadian society. The narrative forms imposed on Hines are more than poetic imagination as they reflect history itself.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.