Abstract
In this essay, emphasis is laid on the differences between the “revolutionary” innovations of Menger, jevons and Walras. The main point is that the persistent historiographic practice of classifying these authors together simply as independent discoverers of very much the same marginal utility principle has obscured essential differences not only in the original intent and design of their theoretical edifices, but also in the influence their major works exerted, each in a way of its own, upon the subsequent development of economic thought.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
