Abstract
Popular and critical urges to approach fiction and poetry as personal revelation or through the lens of biography are prone to meet with resistance. Various literary performances, some widely known, have themselves sought to prevent, confuse, or oppose these routes of access. Melville’s writings stage numerous aversions to presumptive biographical relevance, and this essay examines the John Marr volume as a late instance, signaled by omitted authorship and a prefatory piece that declares “personal feeling” to be unsuited to the “printed page.” “Inscription Epistolary” is an unusual preface for a nineteenth-century verse or prose collection, yet its features and sentiments enact a recurring gesture that invites comparison with more celebrated cases. Such cases attest to the equivocal allure and wayward paths of genetic reasoning, frequently compounded by authorial aversions to it.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
