Abstract
Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Communications and UpdatesFull AccessMelancholia as a Distinct Mood Disorder? Recommendations for DSM-5James H. Kocsis, M.D.James H. KocsisNew York, N.Y.Search for more papers by this author, M.D.Published Online:1 Dec 2010https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10070983AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail To the Editor: In an editorial in the July 2010 issue of the Journal, Gordon Parker, M.D. (1), and a distinguished group of 16 coauthors, including one of the Deputy Editors of this journal, made an argument for melancholia being classified as a distinct mood disorder. The arguments that 1) melancholia features a cluster of symptoms with greater consistency than the broad heterogeneity of the disorders and conditions included in major depression and bipolar disorder and 2) the melancholia diagnosis has superior predictability for prognosis and treatment were not well supported by the evidence. For example, the statement that melancholic patients rarely respond to placebos, psychotherapies, or social interventions could equally well apply to severe major depression and psychotic major depression, both of which are major depression subtypes, as is melancholia, allowed as “specifiers” in the DSM-IV classification of major depression. Relevant literature reveals that hypercortisolemia is not specific to the melancholia diagnosis (2, 3). More importantly, in many studies the melancholia diagnosis lacks predictive value for treatment selection, including response to antidepressant medications or differential predictive value for response across classes of antidepressants (4, 5). Because each of the specifiers designated in DSM-IV shares characteristics with the larger domain of major depression and yet each has its own distinctive qualities (for melancholia it is a characteristic cluster of symptoms), it makes sense to retain the current system in DSM-5.New York, N.Y.Dr. Kocsis has received research grant support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, AstraZeneca, Burroughs Wellcome Trust, CNS Response, Forest, Pritzker Consortium, and Roche; he has served on the speaker's bureaus of AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, and Wyeth; and he has served on the advisory boards of Neurosearch, Pfizer, and Wyeth.This letter was accepted for publication in September 2010.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.