Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the medium-term outcomes after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis surgery in patients with poor prognosis for standard keratoplasty. A prospective study of a case series was conducted at a university-based referral center from 2006 to 2013. Forty-two eyes of 40 patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 years were recruited. The main outcome measures included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), keratoprosthesis retention, and complications. The mean follow-up was 64.9 ± 15.2 months (range, 48-88 months). At 1 week, 90.5% had an improvement in BSCVA by ≥2 lines compared with that in preoperative BSCVA. The best-ever vision was reached by the end of 6 months. Nevertheless, 39.5% (15/38) could not maintain the improved vision. The major etiology of visual deterioration after initial gains was glaucoma (60%). The initial keratoprosthesis retention rate was 80.9%, corresponding to a failure rate of 4 per 100 eye-years or 0.04/eye-year. Autoimmune diagnosis was the independent risk factor for keratoprosthesis failure (hazard ratio, 5.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-22.85; P = 0.014). The common postoperative complications were glaucoma, retroprosthetic membrane, corneal melting, infectious keratitis, and endophthalmitis. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis is an alternative for patients who are not candidates for corneal transplants. However, there was a trend toward visual loss over time most commonly because of progressive glaucoma. Therefore, appropriate patient selection, lifelong follow-up, and early aggressive treatment of complications are recommended.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.