Medico-Legal issues in a neurosurgical case series of Rathke Cleft Cysts. Informed consent, complications and medical liability

Abstract

Rathke cleft cysts (RCCs) are asymptomatic benign sellar cysts. Their surgical treatment may lead to a series of well known complications, many of which can be interpreted as failed surgical interventions. We present a retrospective study on patients with treated RCCs that filed a claim for compensation for medical professional liability, with the aim of reporting the medico-legal issues related to the surgical resection of RCC.A retrospective analysis was performed between 1999 and 2016 on patients diagnosed with RCCs and who underwent surgical resection. The clinical experience of the patients alleging medical liability was analysed by an interdisciplinary group following the European Guidelines proposed by the European Academy of Legal Medicine. Eight patients developed late complications and made a claim for compensation. Only in one case a prognostic error was detected. The pre- and postoperative conditions, as well as the onset of early and late complications are reported and discussed in the paper, as well as the differentiation between “error-free” vs “error-related” complications.Understanding the underlying causes of the increase in compensation claims, as in the specific case, can help not only in the reduction of errors, but also in the prevention of compensation claims, which result in an increase in public and private spending. One of the main causes of the disproportion between the request for compensation and actual compensation is the expectation regarding surgery and the onset of complications, which could be solved through the appropriateness of consent submitted before the intervention.