Medical case reports of Candidozyma auris (syn. Candida auris) infections in Europe - a systematic review.

Patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) show different clinical courses ranging from asymptomatic to severe infection requiring intensive care treatment and death. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR), used in the diagnosis, screening and surveillance of coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19), provides the viral load as a cycle threshold (Ct) value. It has been reported that the Ct value may be related to the course of the infection and the clinical condition of the patient. In this study, it was aimed to compare the Ct and C reactive-protein (CRP) results of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who were found to be positive with rRT-PCR. Between 14 April and 29 August 2020, a total of 355 patients aged 18 years and older with positive SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR test were included in the study. The COVID-19 rRT-PCR test was performed with Bio-speedy SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR kit (Bioeksen, Turkey) versions, the kit targeting the RdRp gene region, and the dual gene kit versions targeting the N and ORF1ab gene regions were used. Patients were classified as symptomatic and asymptomatic according to their clinical findings. Ct and CRP results of the patients were analyzed statistically. Of the 355 patients included in the study, 237 (66.7%) were symptomatic and 118 (33.2%) were asymptomatic patients. The mean age of symptomatic patients (46.68 ± 18.03) was observed significantly higher than asymptomatic patients (38.27 ± 13.82) (p<0.001). When the patients are evaluated according to the age groups, the rate of asymptomatic patients was significantly higher in the 21-39 age group, while the rate of symptomatic patients was significantly higher in 65 years and older group (p<0.05). The rate of comorbidity was significantly higher in symptomatic patients (n= 69, 29.1%) than in asymptomatic patients (n= 11, 9.3%) (p<0.001). Hypertension (12.2%), diabetes mellitus (9.7%), chronic respiratory disease (9.3%) and cardiovascular diseases (5.5%) were the most common diseases in symptomatic patients. However, among these, hypertension and chronic respiratory disease were found significantly higher in symptomatic patients (p<0.05). Increased CRP rate in symptomatic patients (64.6%) was found significantly higher than asymptomatic patients (27.3%) (p<0.001). The median of Ct value was found significantly higher in asymptomatic patients (26.34, IQR= 19.78-35.48), than in symptomatic patients (21.77, IQR= 17.81-26.51) (p<0.001). Regarding the medians of Ct values obtained from target genes; RdRp gene Ct value was found significantly higher in asymptomatic patients than in symptomatic patients (p<0.001). However, no statistical difference was found between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in the ORF1ab and N genes Ct value medians (p> 0.05). As a result, it was observed that SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients were symptomatic in the presence of advanced age and comorbidity. Increased CRP value at the time of admission to the hospital was found significantly higher in symptomatic patients. Ct value has been shown to be lower in symptomatic patients, as expected. Although Ct and CRP values are thought to be useful in monitoring the clinical course and prognosis of patients with COVID-19, more detailed studies are needed to prove their clinical value.

Critique of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST): Flaws in CREST and its Interpretation

Carotid artery disease is a major cause of ischemic stroke, the risk of which is directly related to the severity of stenosis and presence of symptoms.1,2 Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States, with approximately three quarters of a million strokes per year. Stroke is the leading cause of functional impairment, with more than 20% of survivors requiring institutional care and up to one third having a permanent disability.3 More worrisome, however, is the fact that as the population ages, the number of patients having strokes appears to be increasing.4 The pathophysiology of stroke may be broadly classified as hemorrhagic, embolic, or ischemic. The majority of strokes are caused by embolic events due to atheroemboli from the carotid artery, the ascending aorta, and arch vessels or cardiac thromboembolism from the left atrium or ventricle. It is estimated that carotid artery stenosis is responsible for 15% to 20% of all strokes.5 As percutaneous treatment options expand, there is uncertainty about appropriate therapy for carotid disease. This document will focus on 3 current controversies: (1) carotid artery revascularization in asymptomatic patients, (2) carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients who are considered to be at increased surgical risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and (3) the current role for CAS in patients at average surgical risk. ### Prevalence and Natural History The prevalence of asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis (≥50%) in persons >65 years of age is estimated to be between 5% and 10%, whereas ≤1% of patients are estimated to have a severe narrowing (>80%).6 In asymptomatic patients with ≥50% carotid artery stenoses, the annual risk of stroke is between 1% and 4.3%.2,7 Long-term (10- to 15-year) cohort studies in asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe carotid stenosis demonstrate an ipsilateral stroke rate between 0.9% and 1.1% per …

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. INTRODUCTION Both angina and dyspnea symptoms are the most common clinical manifestations of cardiac ischaemia. Nevertheless, cardiac ischaemia may be detected on control functional tests of patients with ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy despite being asymptomatic. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of elective myocardial revascularization on patient’s prognosis depending on baseline clinical symptoms. METHODS All consecutive patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF &amp;lt;40% determined by gated-SPECT) who underwent stress-rest SPECT in our hospital between January 2010 and February 2018 were included. Baseline patients’ clinical presentation (angor pectoris, dyspnea or asymptomatic) and major adverse events (myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death) were retrospective recorded. RESULTS A total of 748 patients with multiple comorbid conditions (smoking habit 69%, hypertension 78,7%, diabetes mellitus 49,5%, atrial fibrillation 22,1%, previous myocardial infarction 69% and previous heart failure hospitalization 24,9%) were included. Nonemergent coronary intervention during the first year (17,9% of patients) was associated with a reduction in the composite event (HR 0.69 [0.5-0.95]) but the multivariate analysis showed a prognostic benefit of revascularization in symptomatic patients (HR = 0.59 [0.37 - 0.94]) that was not observed among asymptomatic patients. The relative risk of the composite endpoint was RR = 0.63 (p &amp;lt;0.001) for asymptomatic vs. symptomatic non-revascularized patients and RR = 1.09 (p = 0.60) for asymptomatic vs. symptomatic revascularized patients. Finally, asymptomatic patients presented more necrosis (17.3 vs. 20.2%, p &amp;lt;0.01) and less ischemia (9.7 vs. 5.7%, p &amp;lt;0.001) than symptomatic patients. CONCLUSION Patients with ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy without symptoms of dyspnea or angina present less ischaemia and more necrosis in stress-rest SPECT than symptomatic patients. Moreover, unlike symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients do not benefit from elective revascularization. Therefore, the clinical presentation should be considered when deciding revascularization of patients with ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and a positive SPECT test. Abstract Figure. Kaplan-Meyer curves

Preoperative anemia is associated with mortality after carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients

von Willebrand factor propeptide (VWF:Ag II) is potentially a more sensitive marker of acute endothelial activation than von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag). These biomarkers have not been simultaneously assessed in asymptomatic versus symptomatic carotid stenosis patients. The relationship between endothelial activation and cerebral microembolic signals (MESs) detected on transcranial Doppler ultrasound is unknown. In this multicentre observational analytical study, plasma VWF:Ag and VWF:Ag II levels in patients with ≥50% asymptomatic carotid stenosis were compared with those from patients with ≥50% symptomatic carotid stenosis in the 'early' (≤4weeks) and 'late' (≥3months) phases after transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke. Endothelial activation was also longitudinally assessed in symptomatic patients during follow-up. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound monitoring classified patients as MES-positive or MES-negative. Data from 31 asymptomatic patients were compared with those from 46 early symptomatic and 35 late phase symptomatic carotid stenosis patients, 23 of whom had undergone carotid intervention. VWF:Ag II levels were higher in early (12.8μg/ml; P<0.001), late (10.6μg/ml; P=0.01) and late post-intervention (10.6μg/ml; P=0.038) symptomatic patients than asymptomatic patients (8.9μg/ml). VWF:Ag levels decreased in symptomatic patients followed up from the early to late phase after symptom onset (P=0.048). Early symptomatic MES-negative patients had higher VWF: Ag II levels (13.3 vs. 9.0μg/ml; P<0.001) than asymptomatic MES-negative patients. Endothelial activation is enhanced in symptomatic versus asymptomatic carotid stenosis patients, in early symptomatic versus asymptomatic MES-negative patients, and decreases over time in symptomatic patients. VWF:Ag II levels are a more sensitive marker of endothelial activation than VWF:Ag levels in carotid stenosis. The potential value of endothelial biomarkers and concurrent cerebral MES detection at predicting stroke risk in carotid stenosis warrants further study.

There is limited information about the clinical course and viral load in asymptomatic patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). To quantitatively describe SARS-CoV-2 molecular viral shedding in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. A retrospective evaluation was conducted for a cohort of 303 symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 6 and March 26, 2020. Participants were isolated in a community treatment center in Cheonan, Republic of Korea. Epidemiologic, demographic, and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. Attending health care personnel carefully identified patients' symptoms during isolation. The decision to release an individual from isolation was based on the results of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay from upper respiratory tract specimens (nasopharynx and oropharynx swab) and lower respiratory tract specimens (sputum) for SARS-CoV-2. This testing was performed on days 8, 9, 15, and 16 of isolation. On days 10, 17, 18, and 19, RT-PCR assays from the upper or lower respiratory tract were performed at physician discretion. Cycle threshold (Ct) values in RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection were determined in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Of the 303 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the median (interquartile range) age was 25 (22-36) years, and 201 (66.3%) were women. Only 12 (3.9%) patients had comorbidities (10 had hypertension, 1 had cancer, and 1 had asthma). Among the 303 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 193 (63.7%) were symptomatic at the time of isolation. Of the 110 (36.3%) asymptomatic patients, 21 (19.1%) developed symptoms during isolation. The median (interquartile range) interval of time from detection of SARS-CoV-2 to symptom onset in presymptomatic patients was 15 (13-20) days. The proportions of participants with a negative conversion at day 14 and day 21 from diagnosis were 33.7% and 75.2%, respectively, in asymptomatic patients and 29.6% and 69.9%, respectively, in symptomatic patients (including presymptomatic patients). The median (SE) time from diagnosis to the first negative conversion was 17 (1.07) days for asymptomatic patients and 19.5 (0.63) days for symptomatic (including presymptomatic) patients (P = .07). The Ct values for the envelope (env) gene from lower respiratory tract specimens showed that viral loads in asymptomatic patients from diagnosis to discharge tended to decrease more slowly in the time interaction trend than those in symptomatic (including presymptomatic) patients (β = -0.065 [SE, 0.023]; P = .005). In this cohort study of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who were isolated in a community treatment center in Cheonan, Republic of Korea, the Ct values in asymptomatic patients were similar to those in symptomatic patients. Isolation of asymptomatic patients may be necessary to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

Coronaviruses OC43, 229E, NL63, and HKU1 are endemic human respiratory coronaviruses that typically cause mild to moderate upper respiratory infections, similar to the common cold. They also may cause simple and complicated lower respiratory infections, otitis media, asthma exacerbations, gastroenteritis, and a few systemic complications. These viruses are usually seasonal (with winter dominance) and affect nearly all age groups. The seasonal and annual variation in virus prevalence has implications for understanding the concept of acquired immunity and its persistence or diminution. Coronaviruses generally have outbreak potential in susceptible populations of any age, particularly in patients with comorbidities, who tend to have increased clinical disease. These 4 coronaviruses are often found in the context of what appears to be coinfection with other pathogens, but especially other viruses. If coronaviruses are not specifically tested for, the sole detection of a viral copathogen would suggest the pathogen is the causative agent, when a coronavirus may be culpable, or both. The detection of these viruses in circumstances where respiratory viruses are generally sought in clinical samples is, therefore, justified. These pathogens can be chronically shed from the respiratory tract, which is more likely to occur among immunocompromised and complicated patients. These viruses share the potential for genetic drift. The genome is among the largest of RNA viruses, and the capability of these viruses to further change is likely underestimated. Given the potential disease among humans, it is justified to search for effective antiviral chemotherapy for these viruses and to consider uses in niche situations should effective therapy be defined. Whereas SARS-CoV-2 may follow the epidemiological pattern of SARS-CoV and extinguish slowly over time, there is yet concern that SARS-CoV-2 may establish itself as an endemic human respiratory coronavirus similar to OC43, 2299E, NL63, and HKU1. Until sufficient data are acquired to better understand the potential of SARS-CoV-2, continued work on antiviral therapy and vaccination is imperative.

Background: The effect of symptoms on clinical outcomes after deferral of revascularization based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains poorly understood.Methods and Results: From the J-CONFIRM (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter) Registry, this study evaluated 1,215 patients with stable coronary artery disease, including symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (n=571 and 644, respectively). The primary endpoint was the cumulative 2-year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), including cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TVMI), and clinically driven target vessel revascularization (CDTVR). An inverse probability weighted analysis was performed to adjust for the differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. At 2 years, the TVF rate did not differ significantly between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (6.5% vs. 4.9%, respectively; P=0.15) or between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with lesions with an FFR ≤0.80 (8.0% vs. 12.3%, respectively; P=0.20). Conversely, symptomatic patients showed significantly higher rates of TVF (6.2% vs. 3.3%; P=0.01) and CDTVR (6.2% vs. 3.1%; P=0.009) than asymptomatic patients, regardless of negative FFR values (>0.80).Conclusions: Despite negative FFR values, symptomatic patients were at higher risk of TVF than asymptomatic patients, driven primarily by a higher rate of CDTVR. Conversely, those with a positive FFR were likely to develop TVF regardless of their symptoms.

Higher Long-Term Mortality with Carotid Artery Stenting in Asymptomatic Male Compared with Female Patients in the Southeastern Vascular Study Group

Objectives:To analyze symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia in terms of initial presentation, risk factors, laboratory findings, clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization.Methods:All laboratory-confirmed reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction positive COVID-19 patients who had been tested at three governmental hospitals in Saudi Arabia (two in Riyadh and one in Makkah) between March 8 and May 18, 2020 were included. Demographics, COVID-19 variables, clinical characteristics and healthcare utilization variables were extracted and combined, and a descriptive analysis was conducted. Symptomatic and asymptomatic (on presentation) patients' data were compared.Results:Eighty percent of the patients were males (81.4% of symptomatic and 73.2% of asymptomatic patients, P = 0.02). Moreover, 47.6% and 38.4% of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were aged 40–64 years, respectively. Fever, cough and breathing difficulties were frequent presenting symptoms. Overall, diabetes (16.4%), hypertension (11.7%), chronic respiratory disease (7.1%) were the most frequent comorbidities, with no differences between the two groups. Symptomatic patients had higher C-reactive protein levels (3.55 vs. 0.30 mg/L; P < 0.0001) and lower total lymphocytes (1.41 vs. 1.70; P = 0.02). ICU admission and mortality were 12.1% and 4.1% in symptomatic, compared to 6.0% and 2.9% in asymptomatic patients, respectively.Conclusion:In the studied COVID-19 cohort, symptomatic patients tended to be older, had higher C-reactive protein and more lymphopenia with worse outcome than asymptomatic patients. This granular analysis of COVID-19 cohorts enables identification of at-risk cohorts in future waves, optimizing development of patient pathways and public health interventions.

Increased platelet activation in early symptomatic vs. asymptomatic carotid stenosis and relationship with microembolic status: results from the Platelets and Carotid Stenosis Study

Carotid Revascularization to Prevent Stroke

The authors determined the sensitivity and specificity of a rapid latex-agglutination test (Pylori-set) to detect Helicobacter pylori infection and screened an asymptomatic Saudi population in different age groups for H. pylori seroprevalence. The study was designed as a blind comparison of a commercial serologic test kit for serologic diagnosis of H. pylori with a standard biopsy-related test in a tertiary referral center and teaching hospital. We included 70 symptomatic male and female Saudi patients, as well as 90 randomly collected sera from asymptomatic Saudi patients. The sensitivity of the Pylori-set was 59%, with a specificity of 89%. Screening of the asymptomatic Saudi population showed an age increase in antibody prevalence. Because of the limited sensitivity in the investigated population, the use of this latex-agglutination test alone cannot be recommended for the serological diagnosis of H. pylori infection in the Saudi population.

The diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis.