Mechanism of the positive contractile effect of nitric oxide on rat ventricular cardiomyocytes with positive force/frequency relationship.

Characterization of the influence of nitric oxide donors on intestinal absorption of macromolecules

In the vasculature it is well established that cGMP is involved in the relaxant response to nitric oxide (NO) and NO donors. However, there is an increasing evidence that alternative/additional pathways that are cGMP-independent may also exist. A key criterion for a response to NO or a NO donor drug to be classified as cGMP-independent is lack of (or incomplete) inhibition by the selective inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclase, ODQ (1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazole[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one). In many blood vessels cGMP-independent mechanisms contribute to the vasorelaxation, and in certain vascular beds cGMP-independent relaxation may be the predominant mechanism of action of NO and NO donors. NO donor drugs that generate NO "spontaneously", like authentic NO (i.e. solutions of NO gas), appear to exhibit a larger component of cGMP-independent vasorelaxation than do those drugs that require bioactivation in the tissue. The long lasting inhibition of responses to vasoconstrictors by S-nitrosothiols, persisting after removal of these NO donors, may be a cGMP-independent process, at least in some vessels. The mechanisms involved in the inhibition of vascular growth by NO and NO donors are predominantly cGMP-independent, as are the mechanisms responsible for the effects of NO donors on apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells. The ability of NO and NO donors to inhibit platelet aggregation has a significant cGMP-independent component. cGMP-independent pathways are most often, though not exclusively, seen at high concentrations (microM - mM) of NO and NO donors. Hence, in relation to the actions of endogenous NO, these pathways may be particularly important in settings when the inducible isoform of NO-synthase is expressed. Furthermore, cGMP-independent pathways are enhanced in animal models of atherosclerosis and ischaemia. This suggests that it may be possible to target cGMP-independent mechanisms with selected NO donors in disease states.

The influence of nitric oxide donors on the responses to nitrergic nerve stimulation in the mouse duodenum

Involvement of guanylate cyclase and potassium channels on the delayed phase of mouse carrageenan-induced paw oedema

Cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion is recommended in certain groups of women. Nitric oxide (NO) donors induce cervical ripening without uterine contractions, but the efficacy and side effects are of concern. To evaluate NO donors for cervical ripening before first-trimester surgical abortion, in terms of efficacy, side effects, and reduction of complications. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and POPLINE. We also searched reference lists of retrieved papers. We contacted experts in the field for information on both published and unpublished trials. Randomised controlled trials comparing NO donors alone or in combination with other methods for cervical ripening in first-trimester surgical abortion. Two review authors independently selected and extracted the data onto a data extraction form. We processed the data using Review Manager (RevMan 5) software. We included 9 studies involving 766 participants. There were no serious complications (infection requiring antibiotic treatment, blood transfusion, complications requiring unintended operation, cervical injury, uterine perforation, death or serious morbidity) in the included trials.NO donors were more effective in cervical ripening when compared with placebo or no treatment. Baseline cervical dilatation before the procedure was higher in NO donors group (mean difference (MD) 0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.58) The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm (MD -4.29, 95% CI -9.92 to 1.35), headache (risk ratio (RR) 1.73, 95% CI 0.86 to 3.46), abdominal pain (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.50), or patient satisfaction (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.07) were not different. More nausea and vomiting occurred in the women who received a NO donor (RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.07 to 6.45).NO donors were inferior to prostaglandins for cervical ripening. The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm to 9 mm was higher (MD 13.12, 95% CI 9.72 to 16.52), and baseline cervical dilatation was less (MD -0.73, 95% CI -1.01 to -0.45) in the NO donor group. However, the probability of dilation greater than 8 mm at three hours was higher in the NO donor group (RR 6.67, 95% CI 2.21 to 20.09). Side effects including headache (RR 5.13, 95% CI 3.29 to 8.00), palpitation (RR 3.43, 95% CI 1.64 to 7.15), dizziness (RR 3.29, 95% CI 1.46 to 7.41), and intraoperative blood loss (MD 33.59 ml, 95% CI 24.50 to 42.67) were also higher. However, abdominal pain (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.44) and vaginal bleeding (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.27) were less in the NO donor group. No difference for nausea/vomiting in both groups(RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.46). Patient satisfaction was not different.One trial compared a NO donor with a NO donor plus prostaglandin. The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm was higher (MD 14.50, 95% CI 0.50 to 28.50) in the NO donor group. There was no difference in headache (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.00), abdominal pain (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.07), or intraoperative blood loss (MD -50, 95% CI -164.19 to 64.19). NO donors are superior to placebo or no treatment, but inferior to prostaglandins for first-trimester cervical ripening, and associated with more side effects.

Cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion is recommended in certain groups of women. Nitric oxide (NO) donors induce cervical ripening without uterine contractions, but the efficacy and side effects are of concern. To evaluate efficacy, side effects and complications of NO donors for cervical ripening before first-trimester surgical abortion. We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Popline. We also searched reference lists of retrieved papers. We contacted experts in the field for information on both published and unpublished trials. Randomised controlled trials comparing NO donors alone or in combination with other methods for cervical ripening in first-trimester surgical abortion. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted the data onto a data extraction form. We processed the data using Review Manager (RevMan5) software. We included eight studies involving 718 participants. There were no serious complications (infection requiring antibiotic treatment, blood transfusion, complications requiring unintended operation, cervical injury, uterine perforation, death or serious morbidity) in the trials included.NO donors were ineffective in cervical ripening comparing with placebo or no treatment. The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm (mean difference -4.29, 95% CI -9.92, 1.35), baseline cervical dilatation before the procedure (mean difference 0.21, 95% CI -0.12, 0.53), headache (RR 1.73, 95% CI 0.86, 3.46), abdominal pain (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.51, 1.50) or patient satisfaction (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84, 1.07) were not different. More nausea and vomiting occurred in the women who received a NO donor (RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.07, 6.75).NO donors were inferior to prostaglandins for cervical ripening. The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8-9 mm was higher (mean difference 13.12, 95% CI 9.72, 16.52) and baseline cervical dilatation was less (mean difference -0.73, 95% CI -1.01, -0. 45) in the NO donor group. Side effects including headache (RR 5.13, 95% CI 3.29, 8.00), palpitation (RR 3.43, 95% CI 1.64, 7.15), dizziness (RR 3.29, 95% CI 1.46, 7.41) and intraoperative blood loss (mean difference 33.59 ml, 95% CI 24.50, 42.67) were also higher. However, abdominal pain (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.25, 0.44) and vaginal bleeding (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07, 0.27) was less in the NO donor group. Patient satisfaction was not different.One trial compared a NO donor with a NO donor plus prostaglandin. The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm was higher (mean difference 14.50, 95% CI 0.50, 28.50) in the NO donor group. There was no difference in headache (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.38, 2.00), abdominal pain (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02, 1.07) or intraoperative blood loss (mean difference -50, 95% CI -164.19, 64.19). NO donors are inferior to prostaglandins for first-trimester cervical ripening, and associated with more side effects. NO donors are comparable to placebo and no treatment for cervical ripening.

Cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion is recommended in certain groups of women. Nitric oxide (NO) donors induce cervical ripening without uterine contractions, but the efficacy and side effects are of concern. To evaluate efficacy, side effects and complications of NO donors for cervical ripening before first-trimester surgical abortion. We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and POPLINE. We also searched reference lists of retrieved papers. We contacted experts in the field for information on both published and unpublished trials. Randomised controlled trials comparing NO donors alone or in combination with other methods for cervical ripening in first-trimester surgical abortion. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted the data onto a data extraction form. We processed the data using Review Manager (RevMan5) software. We included nine studies involving 766 participants. There were no serious complications (infection requiring antibiotic treatment, blood transfusion, complications requiring unintended operation, cervical injury, uterine perforation, death or serious morbidity) in the trials included.NO donors were more effective in cervical ripening comparing with placebo or no treatment. Baseline cervical dilatation before the procedure was higher in NO donors group (mean difference 0.30, 95% CI 0.01, 0.58) The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm (mean difference -4.29, 95% CI -9.92, 1.35), headache (RR 1.73, 95% CI 0.86, 3.46), abdominal pain (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.50, 1.50) or patient satisfaction (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84, 1.07) were not different. More nausea and vomiting occurred in the women who received a NO donor (RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.07, 6.45).NO donors were inferior to prostaglandins for cervical ripening. The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8-9 mm was higher (mean difference 13.12, 95% CI 9.72, 16.52) and baseline cervical dilatation was less (mean difference -0.73, 95% CI -1.01, -0.45) in the NO donor group. Side effects including headache (RR 5.13, 95% CI 3.29, 8.00), palpitation (RR 3.43, 95% CI 1.64, 7.15), dizziness (RR 3.29, 95% CI 1.46, 7.41) and intraoperative blood loss (mean difference 33.59 ml, 95% CI 24.50, 42.67) were also higher. However, abdominal pain (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.25, 0.44) and vaginal bleeding (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07, 0.27) was less in the NO donor group. Patient satisfaction was not different.One trial compared a NO donor with a NO donor plus prostaglandin.The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm was higher (mean difference 14.50, 95% CI 0.50, 28.50) in the NO donor group. There was no difference in headache (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.38, 2.00), abdominal pain (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02, 1.07) or intraoperative blood loss (mean difference -50, 95% CI -164.19, 64.19). NO donors are superior to placebo or no treatment, but inferior to prostaglandins for first-trimester cervical ripening, and associated with more side effects.

Influence of nitric oxide donors and peroxynitrite on the contractile effect and concentration of norepinephrine

Nitric oxide (NO) donors given during ischemia possibly protect the myocardium by increasing tissue cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and decreasing cytosolic Ca2+ levels. However, NO donors also elevate ischemic cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels, which exacerbates ischemic-reperfusion injury. The authors propose that suppression of this NO donor-induced increase in cAMP would improve the cardioprotective properties of these compounds. Langendorff perfused rat hearts were treated with sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 0.1 mM ) or glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, 1.0 microM ) and/or adenylyl cyclase (SQ, 50 microM ) or guanylyl cyclase (ODQ, 30-300 microM ) inhibitors during 40-min low-flow (0.2 ml/min) ischemia. Control reperfusion rate-pressure product (RPP) recoveries were 47 +/- 3% (n = 9) and improved to 59 +/- 1% (n = 11) (p < 0.05) with SNP treatment. Ischemic ODQ treatment decreased RPP recovery to 33 +/- 3% (n = 10) (p < 0.05). ODQ eliminated the cardioprotective effects of SNP (RPP recovery: 40 +/- 5% [n = 7] vs. 59 +/- 1% [p < 0.05]). Adenylyl cyclase inhibition improved RPP recovery from 59 +/- 1% (SNP) to 72 +/- 4% (SNP + SQ) (n = 11) (p < 0.05). The authors conclude that (a) suppression of the NO donor-induced elevations in ischemic cGMP levels (ODQ) worsened reperfusion RPP, (b) suppression of the NO donor-induced elevation in ischemic cAMP levels (SQ) further improved reperfusion RPP in NO donor-treated hearts, and (c) the severity of ischemic-reperfusion injury in the NO donor-treated heart was inversely related to ischemic-tissue cGMP levels and often directly related to the ischemic-tissue cAMP-to-cGMP ratio.

We have examined the mechanisms of action of a broad spectrum of nitric oxide (NO) donors, including several S-nitrosothiols, sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and nitroglycerine (GTN), in relation to their relaxant activity of urethral smooth muscle. For all the compounds examined, NO release (in solution and in the presence of urethral tissue), relaxation responses, elevations in cGMP levels and the effect of thiol modulators were evaluated and compared with the effect of NO itself. Whilst all NO donors, except GTN, released NO in solution due to photolysis or chemical catalysis, this release was not correlated with their relaxant activity in sheep urethral preparations, which were furthermore not affected by the NO scavenger 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl 3-oxide (cPTIO; 0.3 mM). A substantial NO-generating activity was found for S-nitroso-L-cysteine (CysNO) and S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine (SNAP) in the presence of urethral cytosolic fractions, suggesting metabolic activation to NO in the cytosol of the target tissue. In contrast, NO generation from S-nitroso-N-acetyl-L-cysteine (N-ac-CysNO), S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) and SNP were reduced by the presence of urethral homogenate and/or subcellular fractions, suggesting direct NO transfer to tissue constituents. NO donors and NO gas induced dissimilar degrees of cGMP accumulation in urethral tissue, while they were essentially equipotent as urethral relaxants. Furthermore, 1H-[1,2,4] -oxadiazole-[4,3-a]-quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ; 10 microM) inhibited both relaxation and cGMP accumulations, but with different potency for the different compounds. Oxidation of sarcolemmal thiol groups with 5-5'-dithio-bis[2-nitrobenzoic acid] (DTNB; 0.5 mM) enhanced relaxations to GSNO, an effect that was reversed by dithiotreitol (DTT; 1 mM), suggesting a direct effect through nitrosylation/oxidation reactions at the cell membrane, while relaxations to NO and to all the other compounds were not affected by these treatments. Finally, photodegradation of SNP induced the formation of a stable intermediate that still evoked NO-cGMP-mediated relaxations. This indicates that the assumption that SNP is fully depleted of NO by exposure to light should be revised. It can be concluded that important differences exist in the mechanisms by which distinct NO donors relax urethral smooth muscle and they cannot be regarded simply as NO-releasing prodrugs.

Direct measurement of actual levels of nitric oxide (NO) in cell culture conditions using soluble NO donors

Administration of nitric oxide (NO) donors in vivo is accompanied by a baroreflex-mediated increase in heart rate (HR). In vitro, however, NO donors can increase HR directly by stimulating a pathway that involves NO, cGMP, and the hyperpolarization-activated current (I(f)). The aim of this study was to assess the functional significance of this pathway in vivo by testing whether NO donors can increase HR in the anesthetized rabbit independent of the autonomic nervous system. New Zealand White rabbits were vagotomized, cardiac sympathectomized, and treated with propranolol (0.3 mg/kg iv). The NO donor molsidomine (0.2 mg/kg iv) caused a progressive increase (Delta) in HR (DeltaHR, 14 +/- 3 beats/min; P < 0.01). This effect was significantly reduced by the I(f) blocker ZD-7288 (0.2 mg/kg iv; DeltaHR, 2 +/- 3 beats/min; P = not significant). Similar results were seen with sodium nitroprusside. The positive chronotropic effect of sodium nitroprusside (50 microM) was confirmed in the isolated working rabbit heart preparation (DeltaHR, 17 +/- 3 beats/min; P < 0.01). In conclusion, NO donors exert a small, but significant, positive chronotropic effect in vivo that is independent of the autonomic nervous system. These results are also consistent with data in sinoatrial node cells that show that NO donors increase HR by stimulating I(f).

Comparison of the mechanisms underlying the relaxation induced by two nitric oxide donors: Sodium nitroprusside and a new ruthenium complex

1. This study was designed to investigate the effects of the nitric oxide (NO) donors sodium nitroprusside (SNP), 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1) and S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) on N-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP, 1 x 10(-7) M)-induced human eosinophil chemotaxis, cyclic guanosine-3',5'-monophosphate (cGMP) levels, protein nitration and cytotoxicity. 2. Human eosinophils were exposed to SNP, SIN-1 and SNAP (0.001-1.0 mM) for either short (10 min) or prolonged (90 min) time periods. Exposition of eosinophils with these NO donors significantly inhibited the eosinophil chemotaxis irrespective of whether cells were exposed to these agents for 10 or 90 min. No marked differences were detected among them regarding the profile of chemotaxis inhibition. 3. Exposition of eosinophils to SNP, SIN-1 and SNAP (0.001-1.0 mM) markedly elevated the cGMP levels above basal levels, but the 90-min exposition resulted in significantly higher levels compared with the 10-min protocols (5.3+/-0.6 and 2.6+/-0.2 nM 1.5 x 10(6) cells(-1), respectively). The cGMP levels achieved with SNAP were greater than SNP and SIN-1. 4. The NO donors did not induce cell toxicity in any experimental condition used. Additionally, eosinophils exposed to SNP, SIN-1 and SNAP (1.0 mM each) either for 10 or 90 min did not show any tyrosine nitration in conditions where a strong nitration of bovine serum albumin was observed. 5. Our findings show that inhibitory effects of fMLP-induced human eosinophil chemotaxis by NO donors at short or prolonged exposition time were accompanied by significant elevations of cGMP levels. However, additional elevations of cGMP levels do not change the functional profile (chemotaxis inhibition) of stimulated eosinophils.

Photoactive ruthenium nitrosyls: Effects of light and potential application as NO donors