Abstract
This study investigated the mechanical efficiency (ME) and associated factors in obese, overweight, and normal-weight adolescent boys during incremental cycle exercise test to exhaustion. Forty-five sedentary adolescent boys (13–14 years old) were separated in three groups according to the percentage of fat mass as follows: 15 normal-weight (NW) (body fat: 16.0 ± 1.9%), 15 overweight (OW) (body fat: 24.0 ± 1.6%), and 15 obese (OB) (body fat: 31.0 ± 3.0%). All groups completed an incremental cycle exercise to exhaustion in which energy consumption (E, W), ME (%), lipid oxidation rate (LO, %), plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations were determined consecutively at rest and at three intensity levels corresponding to 50 and 75% of each participant’s maximal heart rate (50%HRmax and 75%HRmax) and peak oxygen consumption (O2peak). During the incremental cycle exercise test, plasma epinephrine, and norepinephrine responses as well as ME determined at 50%HRmax, 75%HRmax, and at VO2peak stages were significantly lower in OB compared to NW and OW individuals (ps < 0.01). Multiple linear regressions showed that body weight (ß = -0.64, p < 0.001), energy consumption (ß = -0.24, p < 0.05) and lipid oxidation (ß = 0.69, p < 0.01) were significant predictors of ME at 50%HRmax. However, at 75%HRmax and O2peak, significant predictors of ME were epinephrine (ß = 0.34, ß = 0.49, respectively, ps = 0.01), norepinephrine (ß = 0.26, ß = 0.60, respectively, ps < 0.05) and power output (ß = 0.62, ß = 0.71, respectively, ps < 0.01). These findings suggest that excess in body weight exerts a negative effect on ME at a low intensity by increasing energy consumption for obese and overweight adolescent boys, while at higher intensities (75%HRmax and VO2peak) the lower ME could be better explained by the lower power output and catecholamine responses that were attenuated among obese and overweight adolescent boys.
Highlights
Mechanical efficiency (ME) refers to the ability of an individual to transfer the energy consumed into performing external work (Weinstein et al, 2004)
The present study highlights an important issue regarding predictors of mechanical efficiency (ME) in adolescent boys with different body fat percentages. It appears that underlying factors of ME may diverge according to the intensity of exercise
Our assumption of different underlying factors for ME is supported, and goes beyond the simple relation to the mass of body segments and the energy cost involved in movements (Lafortuna et al, 2006, 2009; Butte et al, 2007)
Summary
Mechanical efficiency (ME) refers to the ability of an individual to transfer the energy consumed into performing external work (Weinstein et al, 2004). For Lafortuna et al (2006), the decreased ME reported in obese adults may be related to the increased proportion of glycolytic muscle fibers (Kriketos et al, 1997) which are substantially less efficient compared to type I fibers The latter interpretation was proposed to explain the higher cycling energy cost (Coyle et al, 1992) found in obese adults as compared to normal weight and overweight adults. The study of Jabbour et al (2013) conducted on 660 children showed that ME was not affected by body weight status For these authors, the contradictory lower ME observed in previous studies may be related to the method used for ME calculation (net vs crude value) The contradictory lower ME observed in previous studies may be related to the method used for ME calculation (net vs. crude value)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.