Abstract

The impact of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for the treatment of advanced heart failure has played a significant role as a bridge to transplant and more recently as a long-term solution for non-eligible candidates. Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs), based on axial and centrifugal design, are currently the most popular devices in view of their smaller size, increased reliability and higher durability compared to pulsatile flow left ventricular assist devices (PF-LVADs). The trend towards their use is increasing. Therefore, it has become mandatory to understand the physics and the mathematics behind their mode of operation for appropriate device selection and simulation set up. For this purpose, this review covers some of these aspects. Although very successful and technologically advanced, they have been associated with complications such as pump thrombosis, haemolysis, aortic regurgitation, gastro-intestinal bleeding and arterio-venous malformations. There is perception that the reduced arterial pulsatility may be responsible for these complications. A flow modulation control approach is currently being investigated in order to generate pulsatility in rotary blood pumps. Thrombus formation remains the most feared complication that can affect clinical outcome. The development of a preoperative strategy aimed at the reduction of complications and patient-device suitability may be appropriate. Patient-specific modelling based on 3D reconstruction from CT-scan combined with computational fluid dynamic studies is an attractive solution in order to identify potential areas of stagnation or challenging anatomy that could be addressed to achieve the desired outcome. The HeartMate II (axial) and the HeartWare HVAD (centrifugal) rotary blood pumps have been now used worldwide with proven outcome. The HeartMate III (centrifugal) is now emerging as the new promising device with encouraging preliminary results. There are now enough pumps on the market: it is time to focus on the complications in order to achieve the full potential and selling-point of this type of technology for the treatment of the increasing heart failure patient population.

Highlights

  • Whether we like it or not, a biological solution remains inadequate to address the magnitude and severity of advanced heart failure

  • Numerical simulations of three support modes of CF-left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been evaluated in a cardiovascular model in terms of blood assist index (BAI), left ventricular external work (LVEW), energy blood flow (EBF), pulsatility index (PI) and surplus haemodynamic energy (SHE)

  • Cardiac transplantation is repeatedly considered as the “gold standard” for the treatment of advanced heart failure, its epidemiological impact remains low and a luxury for a limited group of patients such as those with palliated complex congenital heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy with significantly impaired right ventricular function [125,126]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the REMATCH Trial [1,2], the technological development from pulsatile to continuous flow ventricular assist devices has led to an increased survival of patients on prolonged circulatory support [3,4,5,6]. From an engineering point of view, the greatest challenge is the development of a permanent circulatory support system, which is anatomically adaptable, highly resistant to operate in a corrosive saline environment and structurally compatible to be joined to the flexible tissues of the body. Such systems are expected to operate continuously for years without maintenance. The purpose of this review is to discuss the concepts behind this type of technology with some considerations about current research with potential developments

Type of Devices
Rotary Blood Pumps
Ventricular Interdependence during Mechanical Circulatory Support
Vascular Pulsatility during LVAD Support
Pulsatile or Continuous Flow?
Control of Rotary Blood Pumps and Current Developments
10. The Impact of Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome in VAD-Patients
Findings
11. Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.