Abstract
This paper discusses the main normative measures of multidimensional inequality in well-being and examines the impact of alternative methodological choices in empirical applications. Specific attention is devoted to alternative transformation and normalization criteria, and to normative choices on the degree of substitutability between dimensions and inequality aversion. The empirical application is carried out considering three well-being dimensions (income, health and education) and using Italian data from the IT-SILC survey.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
