Abstract

The concept of mentalizing has been widely studied, but almost exclusively through tasks with explicit instructions. Recent studies suggest that people also mentalize on a more implicit level. However, to our knowledge, no study to date has directly contrasted the effects of implicit and explicit mentalizing processes on an implicit dependent measure within-subjects. We implemented this by using two versions of an object detection task, differing only on secondary catch questions. We hypothesized that if explicit mentalizing relies on complementary processes beyond those underlying implicit mentalizing, this would be reflected in enhanced belief effects in the explicit version. Twenty-eight healthy adults watched movies in which, during the first phase, both they themselves and another agent formed a belief about the location of a ball, and although irrelevant, these beliefs could influence their ball detection reaction times in the second phase. After this response phase, there were occasional catch questions that were different for the explicit and implicit task version. Finally, self-report measures of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptomatology were included, as the literature suggests that ASD is related to a specific deficit in implicit mentalizing. Both in the explicit and implicit version, belief conditions had a significant effect on reaction times, with responses being slower when neither the participant nor the other agent expected the ball to be present compared to all other conditions. Importantly, after the implicit version, participants reported no explicit mentalizing awareness. In our neurotypical sample, ASD symptoms were not found to correlate with either explicit or implicit mentalizing. In conclusion, the reaction time patterns in the explicit and implicit version of the task show strikingly similar effects of mentalizing, indicating that participants processed beliefs to the same extent regardless of whether they mentalized explicitly or implicitly, with no additional effects for explicit processing.

Highlights

  • Theory of Mind (ToM; [1]), called mentalizing, refers to the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and others

  • We found the presence of the ToM effect both under implicit and explicit belief processing: the P-A- condition was significantly slower than all other three conditions

  • Kühn, Gergely, Csibra and Brass [40] investigated implicit mentalizing at the neural level, by means of fMRI, with a version of the Buzz task slightly different from the one used in the current study, and found that the spontaneous tracking of the beliefs of another agent was related to activations in right temporo-parietal junction and medial prefrontal cortex, brain areas known to be consistently activated during explicit mentalizing [41,42]

Read more

Summary

Objectives

The aim of the current study was to do just this, by comparing the effects of using implicit and explicit mentalizing processes directly, on the same dependent variable and using a within-subjects design, circumventing the limitations of previous studies of implicit mentalizing

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.