Abstract
Despite similar conceptual underpinnings, estimates of program replacement rates in the Comparative Welfare Entitlements Dataset and the Social Citizenship Indicators Project do not always correspond with each other. Understanding why these similar conceptual measures vary is important both for understanding replacement rate generosity and for promoting the comparative study of social rights. We find that major differences in estimates of replacement rates in the two projects hinge on a few operational assumptions and some less obvious measurement errors. It seems likely that many of these differences can (and should) be reconciled to produce much more closely correlated measures.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
