Abstract
ObjectivesTo estimate the measurement uncertainty (MU) and reference change value (RCV) for serum free light chain assays (sFLC), and to review their implications on result interpretation. Design and methodsData from 6 to 9months of internal QC and up to 3.5years of EQA results were collected retrospectively, on the Roche Modular P analyzer and Dade Behring BN II nephelometer from two independent laboratories. MU was estimated from its components related to imprecision and bias determinations, while RCV was calculated from the estimated MU and published values on biological variation. Results and ConclusionThe standard uncertainty related to imprecision for the FLC were similar between two instruments, ranging from ~4% to ~8%, so were the uncertainty related to bias, ranging between 24% and 44%. The overall MU with 95% coverage for Fκ, Fλ and their ratio (rFLC) were 55%, 87% and 103% (Modular P), and 49%, 76% and 91% (BNII) respectively. The RCVs with biological variation for Fκ, Fλ and rFLC were comparable between two instruments and averaged 106%, 138% and 173% respectively. The relatively method-independent MU reflected the sFLC limitations. For monoclonal gammopathy detection, the universal rFLC reference limits ±MU gave an effective range of 0.02–3.15 (BNII) (as compared to 0.26–1.65), revealing substantial diagnostic grey zones on both ends. When monitoring disease activity, a minimum change (RCV) of ~100% in FLC concentrations or ~170% in rFLC would be considered significant. Applying MU when interpreting sFLC results puts current diagnostic cut-offs into perspective, and highlights the importance of collating other clinical findings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.