Abstract

To evaluate the reliability in measurements of the thickness of ultrathin gate oxides in the range of 2–9 nm, various techniques based on different methodologies were used for comparison. The physical thickness was determined with medium energy ion scattering spectroscopy (MEIS), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE). The physical thickness was compared with the electrical thickness measured with current–voltage (I–V) and capacitance–voltage (C–V) measurements with quantum effect corrections. The physical thickness of amorphous SiO2 layers in the range of 2–9 nm determined with MEIS and HRTEM is in a good agreement with the corresponding electrical thickness from C–V and I–V measurements within 0.3 nm. For SE, which is the main technique used for in-line monitoring, we observed that it can be used for 2–9 nm ultrathin gate oxides but is more sensitive to the details of the oxide characteristics.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.