Abstract
Recent scholarship has begun to transform the traditional view of Mead as a micro-sociological theorist unable to effectively conceptualize conflict, especially by returning to his writings articulated during and after World War I. Building on this emerging literature with the help of primary source documents, the article traces Mead’s personal experiences during the war, including his contentious break with other pacifists, the pressures he felt to contribute war service at home, the serious battlefield injury of his son, his official duties inspecting officer training curricula, and his founding role in postwar political forums. This enables us to contextualize the ideas Mead developed on political institutions, the individual’s social conscience, hostile impulses, nationalistic solidarity, institution building, and value-commitments in relation to the events that prompted his reflection. The early evaluations of Mead’s ideas on war and politics by his colleagues help us understand how his late work on the development of “international-mindedness” revealed prescient social conditions and dynamics of inter-group conflict.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
