Maxillary sinus inflammation assessment using FDG-PET/CT in head and neck cancer patients with photon, proton, and combined radiation therapy.
Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients frequently develop post-radiation maxillary sinusitis. This study investigated how different radiation therapy (RT) modalities, photon, proton, and mixed photon/proton RT, affect maxillary sinus inflammation, using 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). Seventy-seven HNC patients treated with RT (30 with photon, 20 with proton, and 27 with mixed photon/proton RT) underwent FDG-PET/CT imaging before and 3 months after treatment. Demographic information, tumor location, chemotherapy details, radiation dose (cGy), and post-radiation sinusitis ratings (scale 0-2) were collected. The mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) of the maxillary sinus was measured by a radiologist with two years of experience using manually delineated regions of interest. Parametric paired t-tests were used to compare pre- and post-treatment SUVmeans for each RT modality. Pre-minus-post-treatment changes in SUVmean (ΔSUVmean) between RT modalities were compared using independent t-tests. Correlation between radiation dose and ΔSUVmean and correlation between ΔSUVmean and clinical sinusitis scores were assessed using Pearson correlation analysis. Photon RT was associated with a statistically significant increase in maxillary sinus SUVmean post-treatment (+14.32%, P = 0.0324), while proton RT and mixed photon/proton RT did not result in significant changes (-3.39%, P = 0.6549 and -5.33%, P = 0.4541, respectively). A significant difference was found between photon and mixed photon/proton RT (P = 0.0444), whereas the difference between photon and proton RT approached significance (P = 0.0790). Clinical inflammation ratings were highest for photon therapy (average 0.97), followed by mixed therapy (0.78), then proton therapy (0.65), though these differences were not statistically significant. Our findings demonstrate that photon RT leads to significant increases in maxillary sinus SUVmean as measured by FDG-PET/CT, while proton and mixed photon/proton RT do not show statistically significant changes. These preliminary results suggest that proton-based radiation modalities may be associated with reduced maxillary sinus inflammatory activity compared to photon RT alone, though larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to establish clinical significance and patient outcomes.
55
- 10.1188/02.onf.1063-1080
- Jan 1, 2002
- Oncology Nursing Forum
2
- Jan 1, 2021
- American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
29
- 10.1177/0194599814530858
- Apr 14, 2014
- Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
135
- 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.015
- Nov 21, 2018
- Oral Oncology
193
- 10.2147/cmar.s115761
- Aug 1, 2017
- Cancer management and research
17
- 10.1007/s40134-020-00367-x
- Sep 12, 2020
- Current Radiology Reports
3
- 10.3390/jcm11185316
- Sep 9, 2022
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
42
- 10.1002/cncr.32776
- Feb 25, 2020
- Cancer
84
- 10.1002/hed.24150
- Jul 18, 2015
- Head & Neck
11
- 10.1007/s00411-020-00830-5
- Feb 6, 2020
- Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
- Abstract
1
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.164
- Oct 20, 2018
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Identifying Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Will Benefit Most From Proton Therapy: Implementation of a Quantitative Clinical Decision-Support Tool
- Abstract
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.210
- Sep 1, 2019
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Measuring Radiation Toxicity Using Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Prostate Cancer Patients
- Abstract
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.1407
- Oct 17, 2015
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
The Importance of Self-Care Rehabilitation in Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer Patients
- Research Article
- 10.37029/jcas.v10i1.579
- Dec 1, 2023
- Journal of cancer & allied specialties
Due to the radiation-sparing effects on salivary gland acini, changes in the composition of the oral microbiome may be a driver for improved outcomes in patients receiving proton radiation, with potentially worse outcomes in patients exposed to photon radiation therapy. To date, a head-to-head comparison of oral microbiome changes at a metagenomic level with longitudinal sampling has yet to be performed in these patient cohorts. To comparatively analyze oral microbiome shifts during head and neck radiation therapy, a prospective pilot cohort study was performed at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center and the University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center. A longitudinal metagenomic comparative analysis of oral microbiome shifts was performed at three time points (pre-radiation, during radiation, and immediately post-radiation). Head and neck cancer patients receiving proton radiation (n = 4) were compared to photon radiation (n = 4). Additional control groups included healthy age- and sex-matched controls (n = 5), head and neck cancer patients who never received radiation therapy (n = 8), and patients with oral inflammatory disease (n = 3). Photon therapy patients presented with lower microbial alpha diversity at all timepoints, and there was a trend towards reduced species richness as compared with proton therapy. Healthy controls and proton patients exhibited overall higher and similar diversity. A more dysbiotic state was observed in patients receiving photon therapy as compared to proton therapy, in which oral microbial homeostasis was maintained. Mucositis was observed in 3/4 photon patients and was not observed in any proton patients during radiation therapy. The bacterial de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway and the nitrate reduction V pathway were comparatively higher following photon exposure. These functional changes in bacterial metabolism may suggest that photon exposure produces a more permissive environment for the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria. Oral microbiome dysbiosis in patients receiving photon radiation may be associated with increased mucositis occurrence. Proton radiation therapy for head and neck cancer demonstrates a safer side effect profile in terms of oral complications, oral microbiome dysbiosis, and functional metabolic status.
- Research Article
78
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.053
- Aug 1, 2012
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Enteral Feeding Tubes in Patients Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy for Head-and-Neck Cancer: A Critical Review
- Abstract
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.372
- Oct 23, 2020
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Induced Leukopenia In Head And Neck Cancer Patients Treated With Proton Or Photon Radiotherapy
- Research Article
2
- 10.7860/jcdr/2018/30770.11875
- Jan 1, 2018
- JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Introduction: Cancers affecting the parts of head and neck hugely impact the patients. Among Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients, the visible signs and symptoms of the disease or the side effects of treatment modalities can cause various degrees of functional impairment such as mastication, swallowing and communication or disfigurement. Aim: To study the relationship between self-image and quality of life among head and neck cancer patients. Materials and Methods: This was a descriptive cross sectional survey conducted among 54 head and neck cancer patients. Data were collected through self- dministered demographic proforma, disease related proforma, self-image scale and Functional Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer (FACT; H&N).Association between self-image and demographic and disease related variables were assessed by computing Chi-square.Kruskal Wallis was computed to find the association between quality of life and demographic and disease related variables.Results: Majority of patients i.e., 36 out of 54 (66.7 %) were above 50 years, 43 (79.6%) were men, 47 (87%) were married, 46 (85.18%) had the disease duration of less than six months, 43 (79.6%) were receiving both radiation therapy and chemotherapy as a mode of treatment, 49 (90.7%) of them did not have any co-morbidity, 16 (29.6%) had a mode of feeding other than oral (ryles tube and PEG feeding) and six (11.1%) had undergone tracheostomy. There was a significant association between self-image and monthly income, treatment modality and radiotherapy dose with p =0.013, 0.006 and 0.046 respectively. Kruskal Wallis test value for mode of feeding (4.881) was also statistically significant (0.027) with quality of life. There is positive correlation (r=0.613, p=0.001) between self-image and quality of life of head and neck cancer patients.Conclusion: HNC patients suffer with the disease 24 hours a day. Self-image and quality of life of these patients is interrelated.As the self-image improves, the quality of life will be better and vice versa.
- Research Article
- 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-4257
- Jul 1, 2018
- Cancer Research
Introduction: Cancer-related fatigue is physical, emotional, or cognitive exhaustion which can affect treatment adherence and quality of life, and predict survival. Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients experience high levels of fatigue due to the degree of radiotherapy (RT), but that alone does not fully explain it. Recent studies suggest that fatigue may be related to a patient's personalized metabolic and inflammatory response, suggesting a patient's gene expression (GE) may be used to predict and monitor fatigue - a precursor to managing it. In this analysis, we examined whether GE is predictive of pre-RT patient reported fatigue using cross-validated penalized Lasso regression - a machine learning approach. Study population: From Emory University Clinics, 44 HNC patients donated blood samples before undergoing RT. GE was assessed using an Affymetrix Clariom S Human microarray which measures gene transcripts for roughly 24,000 genes; each probe was log-transformed, normalized, and standardized. The validated 20-item self-report multidimensional fatigue inventory questionnaire measured each patient's continuous fatigue score. Methods: To predict fatigue, we used leave-one-out cross validation (CV). This means we built a Lasso regression model using GE probes from 43 of 44 subjects and used that model to predict fatigue for the remaining subject; this process was repeated 44 times until all subjects had a predicted fatigue score. We chose penalized Lasso regression because the ‘penalty' performs variable selection and mitigates collinearity between the GE probes; the penalty was chosen by an extra layer of CV not described. We compared the predicted fatigue scores to the corresponding patient reported fatigue scores using R2 (higher values mean stronger correlation and better prediction). Results: To test the approach, we allowed the Lasso regression to build a model based on all subjects and predict fatigue on all subjects. This prediction was expected to be high, and it was (R2=0.98). However, the approach was less successful predicting fatigue during the leave-one-out CV prediction (R2=0.15). The probes most influential predicting fatigue are linked to genes involved in tryptophan metabolism (precursor to the neurotransmitter serotonin), double strand break DNA repair, and transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling (inflammation cytokine). Conclusions: Gene expression may predict fatigue in head and neck cancer patients, but there is room for improvement. The model suggests that a patient's personalized DNA repair process, metabolic and inflammatory response may play key roles in patient fatigue. Integrating more data focused on these biological processes, for instance patient metabolomics, may improve the model performance. Future efforts include collecting a larger sample, trying alternative machine learning methods, and testing the robustness of the model over time. Citation Format: Ronald C. Eldridge, Andrew H. Miller, Deborah W. Bruner, Jonathan J. Beitler, Kristin A. Higgins, Evanthia C. Wommack, Linh Kha Huynh, Nabil F. Saba, Dong M. Shin, Canhua Xiao. Predicting fatigue levels of head and neck cancer patients with gene expression using machine learning [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4257.
- Research Article
23
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.11.021
- Dec 5, 2021
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Tooth Failure Post-Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer: Primary Report of the Clinical Registry of Dental Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Patients (OraRad) Study
- Abstract
3
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.063
- Mar 16, 2018
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Survival After Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy in Patients With Head and Neck Cancers: A Study of the National Cancer Database
- Abstract
1
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1537
- Sep 30, 2010
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Osteopontin Plasma Levels in Head and Neck Cancer Patients During Radiotherapy
- Research Article
- 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e16056
- May 20, 2012
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
e16056 Background: Little is known about the relationship between psychological distress and physical symptoms in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT), and how these relationships may change over the course of treatment. We conducted exploratory analyses, on a previously published descriptive study examining the occurrence and severity of physical symptoms during RT. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine the relationship over time between psychological distress and physical symptoms in HNC patients. Methods: Ninety HNC patients receiving RT completed a Symptom Inventory (SI) weekly for five weeks, beginning with the week prior to the start of treatment. The SI assesses the presence and severity of 12 symptoms, including, pain, fatigue, nausea, disturbed sleep, feeling distressed, shortness of breath, memory, lack of appetite, drowsiness, vomiting, skin problems, and urination difficulty. Change scores in symptom severity between baseline and weeks 2, 3 and 4 were calculated, and Pearson’s correlations were used to determine the associations between psychological distress and physical symptoms. Results: Changes in psychological distress between baseline and week 2 of treatment were significantly correlated with changes in fatigue (r = 0.35, n=52, p = 0.01) and skin problems (r = 0.40, n=36, p = 0.02). Changes in psychological distress between baseline and week 3 of treatment were significantly correlated with changes in fatigue (r = 0.42, n=42, p = 0.006), shortness of breath (r = 0.48, n=42, p = 0.001), memory (r=0.36, n=42, p = 0.02), and lack of appetite (r = 0.53, n=42, p = 0.001). Changes in psychological distress between baseline and week 4 of treatment were correlated with changes in fatigue (r = 0.57, n=40, p=0.001), memory (r=0.48, n=39, p=0.002), and lack of appetite (r=0.49, n=40, p=0.001). Conclusions: Fatigue, memory, shortness of breath, and lack of appetite are significantly related to psychological distress in HNC patients undergoing RT. Additional research is needed to determine how psychological distress affects physical symptoms and if improvements in psychological distress may attenuate physical symptoms in HNC patients receiving RT.
- Research Article
12
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2320
- Aug 3, 2020
- International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
Proton Radiotherapy to Preserve Fertility and Endocrine Function: A Translational Investigation
- Research Article
1
- 10.1007/s00520-025-09244-9
- Mar 15, 2025
- Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
Suicidality is a pertinent issue among head and neck cancer patients. Our primary aim is to investigate the current suicidality rate among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients and evaluate risk factors associated with suicidality. We thoroughly searched primary original research from January 2024 onwards across several databases, including PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO. Using a random-effects model, we calculated the odds ratio (OR) for risk factors and conducted a proportional meta-analysis to estimate prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Out of 15 included studies, 305,146 head and neck cancer patients were included. The global prevalence of suicidality among head and neck cancer patients was estimated at 6.8% (95% CI 2.0-20.6%). Major depressive disorder (RR = 5.13, 95% CI 3.60-7.30), psychiatric disorders (RR = 3.73, 95% CI 2.65-5.25), alcohol abuse (RR = 2.67, 95% CI 1.71-4.16), substance abuse (RR = 2.47, 95% CI 1.58-3.85), smoking/nicotine dependence (RR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.60-2.58), and functional compromise (RR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.29-2.36) were identified as significant risk factors. Subgroup analysis by geographical location revealed variations in prevalence, with Asia reporting lower rates than Europe and North America. This systematic review reports the current suicidality rate associated with head and neck cancer patients. Major depressive disorder and other psychiatric comorbidities pose substantial risks requiring early intervention in mitigating the burden of suicidality.
- Abstract
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.675
- Sep 29, 2023
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Association of Provider Zip Code Sociodemographic Characteristics with Radiation Therapy Modality Use in the Medicare Population
- Research Article
- 10.62347/gldl6616
- Jan 1, 2025
- American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
- Research Article
- 10.62347/jxly1661
- Jan 1, 2025
- American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
- Research Article
- 10.62347/oahp6281
- Jan 1, 2025
- American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
- Front Matter
- 10.62347/ergq2963
- Jan 1, 2025
- American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
- Research Article
- 10.62347/dcgc3250
- Jan 1, 2025
- American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
- Research Article
- 10.62347/xdlp4069
- Jan 1, 2025
- American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
- Front Matter
- 10.62347/kjlm2547
- Jan 1, 2025
- American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
- Research Article
- 10.62347/ghka7738
- Jan 1, 2025
- American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
- Front Matter
- 10.62347/vhyy2134
- Jan 1, 2025
- American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
- Research Article
- 10.62347/axtl7711
- Jan 1, 2025
- American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.