Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of kidney function in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy treated with nefecon or sparsentan

Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade in Advanced Kidney Disease: Stop or Continue?

Long-term mortality benefit of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia undergoing vascular intervention

Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With CKD: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Background and Aims Primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is an immune-mediated disease that can lead to kidney failure, need for dialysis and kidney transplantation, and early death. IgAN is the most common type of primary glomerulonephritis globally, with an estimated worldwide incidence of 2.5 per 100 000 individuals per year. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a measure of renal function and is accepted as a surrogate endpoint for clinical trials evaluating kidney function deterioration. In December 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted full approval to Nefecon (marketed as Tarpeyo® by Calliditas Therapeutics), a targeted-release formulation of budesonide, to reduce the loss of kidney function in adults with IgAN at risk of disease progression, based on the Phase 3 NefIgArd clinical trial. In February 2023, sparsentan (marketed as Filspari™ by Travere Therapeutics) was granted accelerated approval by the FDA to reduce proteinuria in adults with primary IgAN at risk of rapid disease progression, generally a urine protein–creatinine ratio (UPCR) ≥1.5 g/g, based on the Phase 3 PROTECT study. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) is a widely accepted and relevant methodology for comparing treatments across trials in the absence of head-to-head comparisons. In this analysis, we aimed to compare the effects of Nefecon and sparsentan on kidney function deterioration in patients with IgAN, as assessed by eGFR. Method An anchored MAIC was performed to estimate the relative effect of Nefecon and sparsentan on the absolute eGFR change from baseline at 9, 12 and 24 months, with common comparators of optimized renin–angiotensin system inhibition for NefIgArd and irbesartan for PROTECT. Patient-level data from NefIgArd were used to select a population matched to PROTECT, and the following baseline characteristics were used to determine the weights: mean age (years), sex (% male), race (% white), mean eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2), mean UPCR (g/g), urine albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) (% with UACR >1.1 g/g), and urinary protein excretion (% with urinary protein excretion >1.8 g/day). Absolute change in eGFR was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) method, including baseline, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, 18- and 24-month data, baseline eGFR, baseline eGFR-by-time interaction, treatment, and treatment-by-time interaction. The MAIC weights were incorporated into the MMRM. A Bayesian fixed-effects network meta-analysis was performed on the relative effect from PROTECT and the weighted relative effect from NefIgArd, measured by the estimated absolute change from baseline in eGFR. Results The matching-adjustment of the NefIgArd patient population to the PROTECT population is shown in Table 1. The weighted NefIgArd population exhibits very similar baseline characteristics to the PROTECT population. The effective sample size of the weighted NefIgArd population is 208. Results from the anchored MAIC showed statistically and clinically significant favorable effects of Nefecon versus sparsentan on eGFR for all time points analyzed (Fig. 1). Mean differences in the absolute change in eGFR of 5.68 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% credible interval [Crl] 3.14, 8.20; p < 0.001), 3.48 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% Crl 0.97, 5.97; p = 0.006) and 3.28 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% Crl 0.02, 6.51; p = 0.048) were observed when comparing Nefecon with sparsentan at 9 months vs 36 weeks, 12 months vs 48 weeks, and 24 months vs 106 weeks, respectively. Conclusion After accounting for differences in the patient populations from the NefIgArd and PROTECT trials, the anchored MAIC showed that treatment with Nefecon 16 mg/day for 9 months was associated with greater eGFR benefit compared with continuous treatment with sparsentan 400 mg/day over 2 years, with significant differences observed as early as 9 months after treatment initiation and sustained up to 2-years of follow-up.

Indirect Treatment Comparison of CC-486 Versus Azacitidine (AZA) As Maintenance Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

No large cohort study has yet determined the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in children with heart failure treated with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors. We thus retrospectively analyzed the incidence and risk factors for severe AKI (stages 2-3 according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines) at our institutions from 2008 to 2011. Among 312 children (162 boys; median age, 7.3 months), 59 cases of AKI occurred in 45 children. The incidence of AKI was 14.3 cases per 100 person-years overall (follow-up 413.6 person-years), or 27.3, 16.8, and 4.5 cases per 100 person-years in children aged <1, 1-3, and ≥4 years, respectively. Among them, 23 (39.0 %) children had metabolic acidosis and 14 (23.7 %) had hyperkalemia. Younger age, myocardial disease, cyanotic congenital heart disease, use of spironolactone, and cardiac surgery were independent risk factors for AKI. Furthermore, 37.3 % of children suffered dehydration during AKI. AKI incidence is relatively high in children, particularly younger children, with heart failure treated using RAS inhibitors. Careful monitoring of renal function and serum electrolytes is essential. Proper management of fluid balance after infection and cardiac surgery may reduce the risk of AKI. Temporary discontinuation in RAS inhibitors should be considered during dehydration or surgery. • Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are the two main classes of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors used to treat hypertension, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and hyperkalemia are potentially life-threatening complications associated with the use of ACEIs and ARBs. Some reports have suggested that dehydration and cardiac surgery are risk factors for AKI in children. However, no large-scale cohort studies have determined the incidence of AKI, its risk factors, and its outcomes in children with heart failure treated with ACEIs and/or ARBs. What is new: • In this retrospective cohort study, we determined the incidence, severity, and risk factors for severe AKI in children with heart failure treated with ACEIs and/or ARBs. The incidence of AKI in these children was relatively high (14.3 episodes per 100 person-years). In addition, younger age, myocardial disease, cyanotic congenital heart disease, concomitant use of spironolactone, and cardiac surgery were risk factors for AKI. Furthermore, 37.3 % of children had dehydration during AKI episodes. • Our results suggested that appropriate fluid balance after infection and cardiac surgery might reduce the risk of AKI and its complications. Temporary discontinuation or reductions in the levels of ACEIs and/or ARBs during dehydration or before surgery may also be warranted in these patients.

It is unknown whether initiating renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is superior to alternative antihypertensive agents such as calcium channel blockers (CCBs). We compared the risks for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with advanced CKD in routine nephrology practice who were initiating either RAS inhibitor or CCB therapy. Observational study in the Swedish Renal Registry, 2007 to2017. 2,458 new users of RAS inhibitors and 2,345 CCB users with estimated glomerular filtration rates<30mL/min/1.73m2 (CKD G4-G5 without KRT) who were being followed up by a nephrologist. As a positive control cohort, new users of the same drugs with CKD G3 (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 30-60mL/min/1.73m2) were evaluated. RAS inhibitor versus CCB therapy initiation. Initiation of KRT (maintenance dialysis or transplantation), all-cause mortality, and MACE (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke). HRs with 95% CIs were estimated using propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for demographic, clinical, and laboratory covariates. Median age was 74 years, 38% were women, and median follow-up was 4.1 years. After propensity score weighting, there was significantly lower risk for KRT after new use of RAS inhibitors compared with new use of CCBs (adjusted HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.69-0.89]) but similar risks for mortality (adjusted HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.88-1.07]) and MACE (adjusted HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.88-1.15]). Results were consistent across subgroups and in as-treated analyses. The positive control cohort of patients with CKD G3 showed similar KRT risk reduction (adjusted HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56-0.80]) with RAS inhibitor therapy compared with CCBs. Potential confounding by indication. Our findings provide evidence from real-world clinical practice that initiation of RAS inhibitor therapy compared with CCBs may confer kidney benefits among patients with advanced CKD, with similar cardiovascular protection.

Effects of RAS inhibitors on diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Renin–angiotensin system inhibitors, both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, slow progression of mild and moderate chronic kidney disease. However, some evidence suggests that discontinuation of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease might increase estimated glomerular filtration rate or slow its decline. Objective To test the hypothesis that stopping angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, or a combination of both, compared with continuing these treatments, improves or stabilises kidney function in patients with progressive stages 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease based on assessment of kidney function using the modification of diet in renal disease four-variable estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 years, follow-up. Setting Thirty-seven UK hospitals with kidney services. Design An investigator-led multicentre open-label, randomised controlled trial of 411 participants with advanced (stage 4 or 5) progressive chronic kidney disease. Participants Adult patients with advanced (estimated glomerular filtration rate &lt; 30 ml/minute/1.73 m2) and progressive chronic kidney disease who were receiving either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, or a combination of both. Interventions Participants were randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio using a centralised internet-based system to either discontinue renin–angiotensin system inhibitors (n = 206) or continue renin–angiotensin system inhibitors (n = 205). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 years; measurements of estimated glomerular filtration rate made after commencing kidney replacement therapy were excluded. Secondary outcomes included development of end-stage kidney disease or starting kidney replacement therapy, a composite of either a &gt; 50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate or commencement of kidney replacement therapy (including end-stage kidney disease), cystatin C, hospitalisations, blood pressure, exercise capacity and quality of life. Cardiovascular events, death and safety were recorded. Results At 3 years, the least-squares mean (± standard error) estimated glomerular filtration rate was 12.6 ± 0.7 ml/minute/1.73 m2 in the discontinuation group and 13.3 ± 0.6 ml/minute/1.73 m2 in the continuation group [difference −0.7, 95% confidence interval (−2.5 to 1.0; p = 0.42)] with a negative value favouring the continuation group. The treatment effect did not differ (heterogeneity) when data were analysed by the pre-specified subgroups. End-stage kidney disease or kidney replacement therapy occurred in 128 (62%) and 115 (56%) participants randomised to the discontinue and continue renin–angiotensin system inhibitor groups, respectively (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.65). The numbers of cardiovascular events and deaths observed were similar for those randomised to discontinue (108 events and 20 deaths) or continue (88 events and 22 deaths) renin–angiotensin system inhibitors. Limitations Non-white ethnic backgrounds were poorly represented, limiting the generalisability of our findings. The open-label nature of the trial may have affected clinical care and subjective end points, such as quality of life and exercise capacity. We only included patients who were receiving renin–angiotensin system inhibitors at the time of randomisation, thus excluding those who had already discontinued these agents. Conclusions Discontinuing renin–angiotensin system inhibitors in advanced and progressive chronic kidney disease does not cause a clinically relevant change in estimated glomerular filtration rate or difference in its long-term decline. Future work Future work should focus on updating clinical guidelines. Further analyses, in addition to the prespecified analyses, may be undertaken if new estimated glomerular filtration rate equations are introduced into clinical practice. Subgroup analysis by kidney disease aetiology and gender may be undertaken to look for potential differences in outcome in specific groups. Trial registration This trial is registered as STOP ACEi EudraCT Number, 2013-003798-82; ISRCTN62869767. Funding This award was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme (NIHR award ref: 11/30/07), a Medical Research Council (MRC) and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) partnership. This is published in full in Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; Vol. 11, No. 5. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have exercise intolerance that is associated with cardiovascular mortality. CKD patients have exaggerated increases in blood pressure (BP) reactivity and impaired ability to maintain skeletal muscle perfusion during exercise mediated by sympathetic nervous system (SNS) overactivation and decreased nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. Activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) increases central SNS activation and reduces NO synthesis, and prior studies have suggested that RAS blockade may modulate physical function declines. The aim of this study was to investigate whether use of RAS inhibitors (RASi) is associated with greater exercise capacity in CKD, and whether greater exercise capacity with RASi is linked to lower SNS activity and increased NO-dependent endothelial function. 35 hypertensive CKD patients (56.7 ± 7.0 yr) and 20 age-matched controls without CKD (CON, 52.5 ± 8.2 yr) were recruited. Exercise capacity was measured via VO2 peak from a maximal treadmill test, muscle sympathetic nervous activity (MSNA) was measured via microneurography, and vascular endothelial function was measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Participants with CKD were further grouped by current usage of RASi including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) for group difference analyses. There were no baseline differences in demographics or hemodynamics between CKD patients with and without RASi. VO2 peak was greater in CKD patients with RASi compared to CKD patients not on RASi and lower compared to CON (23.3 ± 5.8 vs.16.4 ± 2.9, p=0.007; vs.30.0 ± 7.7, p=0.005 ml/min/kg respectively). MSNA in CKD patients with RASi was lower compared to CKD patients not on RASi but similar with CON (43.9 ± 7.1 vs. 53.8 ± 8.2; p=0.009, vs.38.0 ± 20.3; p=0.103 bursts/min respectively). FMD in CKD patients with RASi was greater compared to CKD patients not on RASi and lower compared to CON (3.2 ± 2.6 vs. 1.3 ± 1.6; p=0.007, vs. 5.0 ± 3.0; p=0.045 % respectively). VO2 peak was positively associated with FMD (r=0.417, p=0.038) and was predicted by the combination of FMD and RASi status (r2 =0.344, p=0.01) and MSNA and RASi status (r2 =0.575, p=0.040) in CKD patients. In summary, hypertensive CKD patients on RASi have better exercise capacity compared to those not on RASi. Furthermore, greater exercise capacity in RASi-treated group was associated with lower resting SNS activity and better NO-dependent vascular endothelial function. Long-term randomized trials examining the effects of RASi on physical function and underlying autonomic and vascular mechanisms are needed to determine its causal effect and its responsible mechanisms in CKD.

IntroductionWhen conducting a Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) for a Health Technology Assessment (HTA), the submitting company typically will have access to Individual Patient Data (IPD) from their own trials, but only aggregate data (AgD) for the comparator. In this case, they can re-weight the IPD so that the covariate characteristics in the IPD trials match that of the AgD trials, using the increasingly popular method of Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC).MethodsWe carried out a simulation study to investigate this method in a Bayesian setting. We simulated three IPD trials comparing treatments A and B (AB-IPD trials), and one aggregate data trial comparing treatments B and C (BC-AgD trial). We investigated two options of weighting covariates: 1. all three studies are weighted separately to match the BC-AgD trial (MAIC Separate Trials). 2. patients are weighted across all three IPD studies to match the BC-AgD trial, but the NMA still considers each trial separately (MAIC Pooled Trials). We compared the results of the MAIC to a standard NMA and a mixed IPD/AgD NMA. We applied these methods to a network of treatments for multiple myeloma.ResultsMAIC can provide more accurate estimates of the relative treatment effects than a standard NMA in the BC-AgD trial population. However, MAIC may decrease the accuracy of the relative treatment effects in the overall population. Treatment rankings were unchanged when applying MAIC to the multiple myeloma network.ConclusionsMAIC is beneficial as a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate that results hold across patient populations. If there is a difference in relative treatment effects attributable to population imbalances, then it is useful to be able to quantify this difference. However, we recommend using either a standard NMA or a mixed IPD/AgD NMA for the base case analysis, given the potential bias that can arise in an MAIC.

Association of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors with long-term outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure and moderate-to-severe kidney function impairment

Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Hypertension: The Role of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 and the Renin-Angiotensin System.

Aims: Lenvatinib and sorafenib have been evaluated in separate Phase III placebo-controlled trials in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer; however, no head-to-head comparative studies are available. We performed an indirect comparison of these agents using matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics, a technique allowing comparison of two studies with patient-level data available for one but only aggregate data available for the other. Patients and methods: Individual patient data were available for the SELECT trial (lenvatinib versus placebo) whereas only published summary data were available for the DECISION trial (sorafenib versus placebo); therefore the SELECT data were adjusted to closely match the DECISION data. Data for patients in SELECT were assigned weights so that weighted mean baseline characteristics of the SELECT population matched those reported for DECISION. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS; corrected for crossover using rank-preserving structural failure time models) were calculated using weighted Cox regression models. Adjusted HRs were used to calculate indirect HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Indirect treatment comparison using unadjusted clinical trial data resulted in an HR for PFS of 0.36 (95% CI 0.22–0.57) for lenvatinib versus sorafenib; MAIC resulted in an HR of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20–0.53), suggesting a statistically significantly superior PFS for lenvatinib. The HR for crossover-corrected OS for lenvatinib versus sorafenib was 0.77 (95% CI 0.44–1.35); MAIC resulted in an OS HR of 0.73 (95% CI 0.40–1.35). Conclusion: After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics using MAIC, lenvatinib was associated with statistically significantly superior PFS compared with sorafenib in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. This suggests lenvatinib may provide superior efficacy compared with sorafenib for patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Keywords: indirect comparison, lenvatinib, overall survival, progression-free survival, radioiodine-refractory, sorafenib

461 Angiotensine-receptors blockers but not angiotensin-converting enzime inhibitors delay the progression of aortic stenosis