Abstract

This brief paper has three objectives. First, we want to defend the thesis that post-marxism is largely a misnomer based on a dubious reading of Marx's own work and that of the marxist tradition. Second, we want to argue for the reexamination of what is original in Marx so that we neither miss the crucial lessons he taught, nor laboriously and wastefully reinvent his wheel. Finally, we will illustrate our general argument with a brief focus on one particular line of postmarxist theory.

Full Text

Published Version

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.