Abstract
Several popular propositions about firms market shares influence antitrust enforcement, legislation, and business practices. These propositions, however, may not always reflect reality. This paper explores exception to the rules that a broadened product market definition benefits the defendant in a monopolization case, that excess capacity and high seller concentration are unlikely to occur in the same market, and that vertical price restraints benefit full price sellers at the expense of their discounting competitors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
