Accelerate Literature Icon
Want to do a literature review? Try our new Literature Review workflow

Mark’s young man – the key to the ending?

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract
Translate article icon Translate Article Star icon

Using narrative criticism as the primary methodology, this paper argues that Mark’s use of the term ‘neaniskos’ (‘a young man’) in his resurrection narrative provides the key to understanding the ending of his gospel at 16:8. The words, clothing and position of the young man all contribute to understanding his role, especially when compared to the other young man in 14:51, with whom he appears to be in narrative relationship. The presence of the young man at the tomb, and the contrast with the young man in 14:51, enables the ending at 16:8 to be seen not as a problem to be solved, but as the intended and powerfully provocative conclusion to Mark’s narrative.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • 10.1163/18712207-12341421
The Comic Frame of Mark’s Passion
  • Apr 16, 2021
  • Horizons in Biblical Theology
  • Stephen B Hatton

This article uses narrative criticism and a study of the word neaniskos in Greek culture to argue that the Gethsemanic young man and the young man in Jesus’ open tomb are linked by comedy. It demonstrates that the naked young man pericope utilizes comic imitation and the word neaniskos to connote comic behavior. With the naked young man as a model, the article proceeds to show that the speech of the messenger in the open tomb is comedy vis-à-vis the narrative of the context. This interpretation has the advantages of explaining the ill-fitting interruption of the naked young man scene in Gethsemane, of making sense of the abrupt ending of the Gospel of Mark, and of fitting the use of the word neaniskos in the Gospel of Mark to a connotation used in classical and Hellenistic Greek culture.

  • Research Article
  • 10.1177/01461079050350040401
Intertextuality, the Hermeneutics of “Other,” and Mark 16:6-7: A New but Not New Challenge for Biblical Interpreters
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture
  • Michael Trainor

The present cultural climate of alienation and suspicion creates a new moment for biblical scholarship. Reclaiming and redefining intertextuality in biblical interpretation with an appreciation for a hermeneutics of “other” can be helpful, especially an explicit and systematic “intertextual” conversation with the voices of the cultural “other” and the biblical text. Mark's resurrection narrative (Mk 16:1—8) and particularly the young man's words to the women at the tomb are studied, employing Julia Kristeva's appreciation of the inner and outer play of a text. A hearing of the Markan text from the perspective of the hermeneutics of “other” reveals startling insights into the gospel's meaning of the resurrection and its implications for a world that suspects the other.

Save Icon
Up Arrow
Open/Close
Notes

Save Important notes in documents

Highlight text to save as a note, or write notes directly

You can also access these Documents in Paperpal, our AI writing tool

Powered by our AI Writing Assistant