Mapping Pathways to Inclusive Music Education: Using UDL Principles to Support Primary Teachers and Their Students

Inclusive education provides opportunities for children with disabilities and non-disabled children to receive education together. The New Education Policy 2020 also promises equal and inclusive education for all. Various teacher-training courses have been recognised by the National Council for Teacher Education and the Rehabilitation Council of India to prepare teachers for providing education to children with disabilities in special and inclusive schools in the country. These courses nurture the skills of future teachers to create an inclusive learning environment, use inclusive teaching strategies, select learning materials according to the needs of the learners, plan and assess children with disabilities, etc. At present, there is a lot of emphasis on Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to create an inclusive learning environment. But the trainees in special education and general teacher education do not have good printed study material available on this topic. The editor and all the authors believe that this book will fill the literary gap and will be helpful for all trainee-teachers and teacher-educators to learn the concept, principles of UDL, lesson planning for UDL, problems in implementation, the role of ICT, and assessment options, etc. All the chapters in this book are useful for special teachers, general teachers, research scholars, trainees of D.Ed., B.Ed., M.Ed., and other teacher training courses in special education & general education. Many enthusiastic and renowned professionals contributed their chapters to this book. Their great contribution made this book worth reading for trainees, teachers, and researchers. This book includes sixteen chapters i.e., Historical Perspective of Universal Design for Learning, Economic Perspectives of Universal Design for Learning: Challenges and Solutions, How Universal Design for Learning is Gaining Momentum in Indian Education System: A Review of Educational Policies and Initiatives, Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Praxis, Guidelines for Implementing Universal Design for Learning, Scope of Universal Design for Learning in Inclusive Education, Universal Design for Learning and Lesson Planning, Using Universal Design for Learning in Higher Education: An Approach towards Inclusion, Universal Design for Digital Age, Universal Design for Learning Based Learning Resources, Challenges and Issues in Implementing Universal Design for Learning, Implementation of Universal Design in India: Challenges and Issues, Accessibility Problems in Educational Institutions, Critics and Remedial as Implementation in Universal Design for Learning Approaches in India, Emerging Pedagogical Options and Universal Design for Learning, Universal Design for Learning and its Role in Holistic Effective Learning and Assessment. This book is a very useful resource in inclusive education. The editor acknowledges the great contribution made by the authors. Critical feedback and suggestions by all readers will be appreciated for further improvement in the content and other aspects of the book.

The researchers piloted an observational protocol to examine the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and checkpoint strategies used during daily instruction with a small sample of general and special education teachers. Observational research on UDL has been recommended within the literature. Researchers used the high-leverage practice of explicit instruction as the anchor for the design of the observation protocol. Findings indicate there is alignment between observed UDL principles and strategies employed at the lesson level and teachers’ self-reports of the UDL principles and strategies employed. Findings also suggest that teachers are using several UDL principles within their daily instruction and that there is overlap among UDL checkpoint strategies and aligned UDL principles. Essential UDL principles that pre-service and in-service teachers are expected to deliver at the lesson level can be prioritised to ensure a developmental approach to the implementation of UDL. Implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.

The purpose of this study is to analyze actual application of UDL(universal design for learning) principles in preliminary special education teachers‘ lesson plans applying for elementary school classes including students with visual impairments. The lesson plans were analyzed by Korean UDL Instruction Analysis Checklist and UDL Practical Application Matrix to analyze satisfaction rates and practical application by UDL principle. The results of this study are as follows. First, the satisfaction rate of UDL principles guidelines was 50.80% in 7 lesson plans. Among the 3 UDL principles, the satisfaction rate was the highest at 53.57% in the principle of engagement, followed by 50.00% in the principle of representation and 48.83% in the principle of behavior and expression. Second, preliminary Special Education Teachers used keywords for each UDL principle at 37.26% in the principle of participation, 35.29% in the principle of action and expression, and 27.45% in the principle of representation. At a time when preliminary special education teachers need to develop teaching skills based on UDL for all learners, including the visually impaired, the results of this study can be used as basic data.

Co-designing accessible and inclusive patient information resources for gastrointestinal endoscopy using Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Principles.IntroductionPatients undergoing GI endoscopy can experience anxiety before their procedure, for numerous different reasons, including ineffective patient education resources received beforehand. Paper-based information leaflets are insufficient to accommodate for the diverse way in which people access, consume and process information. Public and patient involvement (PPI) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) are two well-described pedagogical principles that strive to optimise patient-centred care and inclusivity.ObjectivesOur aim was to apply these principles to design more effective and accessible patient education materials, improving the health literacy of our patients. Working with patient partners, we identified the need to develop high-quality and trustable video resources for patients, that would be available on our hospital website. These videos were co-designed by patients and other key stakeholders.ResultsWe used techniques such as storyboard development, the UDL educational principles of representation, engagement and expression, as well as the individual expertise of our stakeholder panel members to achieve appropriate and accessible information for our patient cohort. The development phase was an iterative process, with feedback and input from patient partners and other stakeholders playing a crucial role in prompting necessary adjustments for accuracy and patient understanding. Our project is the first guide in combining both PPI and UDL principles in the development of patient information and education materials.ConclusionBy involving patients and other key stakeholders as partners, we improved the relevance and quality of our patient information content. Identification of patient partners and appropriate other stakeholders is an important initial step when co-designing patient information resources. The use of UDL in the co-design process allows for a structured approach to creating accessible content, highlighting important steps that otherwise may be overlooked by team members. Formal assessment of the impact of these co-designed videos, through quantitative and qualitative methods, will be assessed as part of a larger study.

This study investigates the implementation of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles through an online professional development module designed for educators in Latvia. The research focuses on the emotions and perceptions of 264 educators as they experience UDL during a four-hour training session. Utilizing a comprehensive methodology that includes unstructured surveys, the study explores how educators feel about the flexibility and choices provided by UDL principles. The findings reveal that educators responded positively to the ability to choose between different task formats and ways of answering tasks. This flexibility heightened their satisfaction and interest during professional development. The study underscores the significance of offering choice and modeling UDL principles during professional development, which fosters a supportive and inclusive teaching environment. Moreover, the results highlight the role of experience exchange and knowledge sharing among educators as critical components in the professional development process. These elements contribute to a more engaging and effective learning experience for educators. This research adds insights to the existing literature on UDL, emphasizing the importance of practical application and emotional engagement in professional development. Overall, the study suggests that integrating UDL principles into professional development can positively influence educators’ perceptions of inclusive teaching practices. The positive emotional responses to choice and flexibility underscore the need for adaptable instructional strategies that cater to diverse learner needs, ultimately promoting a more equitable and accessible educational landscape.

Educator teams consisting of a general education teacher and a special education teacher were recruited to participate in a project where they used the Systematic Supports Planning Process to plan, implement, and monitor individualized supports for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) attending general education classrooms. Educators completed a survey before and after the project where they assessed their confidence in applying Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and provided examples of how they applied UDL principles in their classrooms. Although quantitative responses indicated the confidence levels of general education teachers and special education teachers increased following participation in the project, qualitative findings were mixed regarding specific actions that demonstrated how UDL principles were applied. The implications for future research and professional development on UDL and arranging individualized supports in general education classrooms for students with IDD are discussed.

The aim of this study is to analyze the differences related to students’ motivation between two moments, respectively before and after participation in a program of teaching on the basis of UDL principles. The participants were 72 students with SEN enrolled in mainstream schools in Brașov county, aged between seven and 10 years, M = 8.26, SD = 1.04. The instrument used for measuring motivation was The Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire (DMQ). A number of 37 teachers aged between 25 and 54 years, M = 37.89, SD = 7.56, were involved in the study, of which four men (11%) and 33 women (89%). They participated in the UDL PPS Course (48 training hours). After the course, they started to teach SEN children using UDL principles for six weeks. Students’ motivation was measured twice, before and after the six weeks of UDL teaching. The results showed a significant increase in cognitive persistence, gross motor persistence, social persistence in relation to adults, social persistence in relation to other children, pleasure in doing things well, general competence, and a significant decrease in negative reactions. The discussions emphasize the importance of training teachers in the UDL model.

This study investigates the extent to which universal design for learning (UDL) principles have been used in online courses according to the opinions of professors and students at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University. Using a descriptive approach, the researchers created two questionnaires, one for faculty members and one for students. Each questionnaire contained 36 items on the main principles of UDL: multiple means of representation, multiple means of performance and expression, and multiple means of motivation and participation. The sample consisted of 75 male and femal faculty members and 112 students, who were selected randomly. The results suggested that online courses helped faculty achieve some UDL principles and raise awareness about those principles. There was also high agreement between faculty and students about the positive impact of distance learning, which reportedly increased students’ exposure to many UDL elements, such as offering more means of communication and interaction. In addition, students reported high levels of participation in classes implementing UDL principles.

In this study, three interactive, online modules on Universal Design for Learning (UDL) were delivered over four weeks with teacher candidates to improve their skills and knowledge for developing and implementing lesson plans based on UDL principles. Eight teacher candidates who were in a dual certification degree programme (i.e. general and special education) and enrolled in a graduate-level course participated in the study. After completion of the modules, the candidates significantly enhanced their ability to design lesson plans based on UDL principles and reliably implement the lessons during their student teaching placements in both high- and low- technology settings. The candidates described the discussion forums shared with their peers as the most useful aspect of the modules for promoting their learning. Additionally, teachers revealed a strong willingness to apply the principles of UDL in their future teaching. Limitations and implications are discussed.

Over the past decades, teaching and learning within the discipline of anatomy has undergone significant changes. Some of these changes are due to a reduction in the number of teaching hours, while others are related to advancements in technology. Faced with these many choices for change, it can be difficult for faculty to decide on which new developments in anatomical education need or indeed can be integrated into their course to enhance student learning. This article presents the universal design for learning (UDL) framework-an informed, evidence-based, and robust approach to underpin new course design and pedagogical reform in anatomy education. Universal design for learning is not a theory but a framework grounded in cognitive neuroscience that focuses on engaging multiple brain networks. The guidelines for UDL are organized into three core principles: (1) provide multiple means of representation, (2) provide multiple means of action and expression, and (3) provide multiple means of engagement. The learning space within the anatomy laboratory provides an excellent opportunity in which to apply this framework. This article also describes current trends employed in the teaching of anatomy. The principles of UDL are then outlined, followed by a description of how UDL approaches have been applied in the design and delivery of anatomy practical teaching to first year medical students at University College Cork. Future implications for this work are a consideration and investigation of how a course designed with the principles of UDL at its heart ultimately benefits student learning.

This study aims to investigate how teaching practices in the Italian inclusive education system align with the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL), which is aimed at providing access to education for all students, including those with disabilities. In line with Article 2 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), which requires states to promote Universal Design (UD) in all aspects of life, including education, this research examines the extent to which the Italian education system meets this requirement. The study involved teachers who participated in a course on inclusive education. The research was conducted in three phases, including the introduction of UDL, identification of teachers' perceptions and initial reactions to UDL, compilation of a questionnaire related to UDL checkpoints, and a focus group discussion on teachers' attitudes towards UDL and the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the classroom. The analysis focused on the first UDL principle, "Provide Multiple Means of Representation," which emphasizes the need to present information in an accessible way to learners with disabilities. The findings revealed that despite not having previous training on UDL, teachers in the Italian inclusive education system use ICTs in their daily teaching practices to make knowledge accessible, which is in line with the UDL principles. However, the study also highlighted a lack of awareness and reflection on the use of ICTs in teaching, suggesting the need for specific training to enhance inclusive practices. This study contributes to the ongoing dialogue on inclusive education in Italy and highlights the importance of promoting UD principles in education to ensure that all learners, regardless of their abilities, have equal access to education. Furthermore, it underscores the significance of providing adequate training and support to teachers to facilitate inclusive practices and improve learning outcomes for all students.

This research aims to describe the application of the three UDL principles in higher education, the obstacles experienced and the solutions. The type of research used in this research is library research. The data in this research is in the form of previous research reports published in journals. This research uses national or international journal articles with publication years in the last 5 years (2017-2023). Overall, there were 14 journal articles studied that were relevant to the research topic. Among the 14 journal articles obtained, there were 10 journal articles indexed by Scopus. The results of the research show that (1) the application of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in higher education is by applying the 3 principles of UDL, namely: (a) application of the principle of representation through face-to-face learning, online learning, teaching using lecture methods, discussions, sheets work, delivering material using graphics, video, text, or images, as well as using e-books, (b) applying the principles of action and expression by giving students the freedom to choose how to express their understanding, either verbally, written, hardcopy, or softcopy, (c ) application of the principle of involvement by creating a comfortable learning environment, frequently interacting with students, carrying out group discussions, and using assistive applications (mind tap, clicker, moodle), (2) the obstacle faced by universities in implementing UDL is the large number of students in classes, lack of knowledge and awareness about UDL among teachers and school officials, and lack of time for teachers to apply UDL in learning, lack of interest and motivation in learning. Applying and studying UDL, (3) the solution to overcome the obstacles faced by universities in implementing UDL is to hold training on UDL for teachers and school officials, this training can be in the form of an orientation program or workshop, another solution to overcome the problem of lack of motivation for teachers To adopt and learn UDL is to provide motivation in the form of rewards to teachers who are interested in learning more about UDL.

This presentation showcases findings from a Canadian study which was carried out through 2023-24. This project explores an innovative facet of the momentum around sustainability within higher education, one that goes beyond the focus on environmental and operational preoccupations and concentrates on social and pedagogical sustainability. It examines the way the introduction of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to a campus, through the creation of a cross-discipline community of practice, can (i) empower faculty to develop sustainable accessible practices within their own classroom, (ii) significantly reduce the reliance of the campus on accessibility services and reduce the pressure felt by these services, (iii) successfully integrate accessibility and inclusion within institutional strategic thinking around sustainability. The presentation synthesizes findings from a qualitative action-research project which examined perceptions and experiences of 14 stakeholders with different status and toles across the campus. The study adopted a phenomenological approach to data collection and analysis (Holland, 2014) and explored the participants’ own constructs in relation to the overlap between UDL and sustainability. Accessibility in the higher education has thus far been addressed through a medical model approach focused on retrofitting. In a nutshell, teaching and learning is designed for the ‘traditional learner’ and support services take on the task of supporting students who experience barriers in this design, with remedial, targeted services outside the classroom. The demographics of higher education, however, have changed widely over the last two decades, and retrofitting approaches are no longer sustainable. The volume of demand is growing exponentially, wait times increase, and the cost of Accessibility Services increases in a way that becomes unmanageable within most post-secondary campuses (NEADS, 2018). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) can address many of these strains on resources. Indeed, UDL is an emerging model for the management of diversity in the classroom which equips instructors to remove the majority of barriers to access to learning and support the needs of most diverse learners within the classroom itself (Al-Azawei et al., 2016). The literature highlights that most of the needs of diverse learners can be addressed with ease within the classroom itself once inclusive design and UDL are adopted and integrated as a mindset, across institutions (Baumann & Melle, 2019; Dalton et al., 2019). UDL can therefore address some of the concerns over the sustainability of current disability service provision models. The need for a sustainable lens in this area is therefore tangible and pressing. Accessibility services, student services personnel, and faculty are all painfully feeling first-hand the inability of the current structure to meet the needs of diverse learners and to address the volume of service requests. UDL has the potential to address this strain on support services and to re-empower faculty to create inclusive provisions within the classroom space. A practical example of this would be the considerable pressure placed on accessibility services to digitalize printed material or to seek alternate versions of PDFs that are shared in class but are not accessible with reading software. This is an example of costly, repetitive use of resources that can be solved sustainably by empowering instructors to use the UDL principles in their class design and not rely on print only or on non-accessible digital documents. This has immediate resource and funding implications. UDL integration represents a clear example of sustainable transformation: an initial focus on professional development with faculty leads to a reduction in spending and resources that are non-renewable (Fovet, 2017). The presentation showcases the wider implications for UDL development across the sector.

Students with disabilities are increasingly educated in inclusive settings. Despite this shift, general education teachers typically do not receive adequate preparation for meeting their learning needs. Such deficiencies in preparation have lasting negative postsecondary consequences for students with disabilities. Universal Design for Learning (UDL), a framework of principles for curriculum development that seeks to provide all students with an opportunity to learn, is commonly cited as an educational approach that facilitates inclusive settings. Research suggests that UDL-based instruction fosters improved learning outcomes for students with and without disabilities. The purpose of this study is to examine the incorporation of UDL into preservice general education teacher preparation programs. An online survey was administered to general education faculty members in programs participating in Teacher Quality Enhancement (TQP) grants. TQP participants are expected to prepare educators to understand teaching practices and research that are consistent with UDL. The data collected indicate that UDL is being taught in a wider range of programs and states than previously documented. However, the depth of this penetration appears limited; the survey results suggest that awareness and instruction of the framework were modest for programs with TQP grants. Among faculty who do teach UDL, nearly all address all three UDL principles. At least two thirds provide instruction on seven of the nine associated guidelines. Several barriers to instruction were identified, including a lack of awareness and—among those aware of it—insufficient knowledge of the framework. Recommendations for future research are also discussed.

The practice of universal design―of making a product or environment accessible to all individuals―has been around for a long time. But, until now, that practice has never been explored in depth in the field of physical education. This groundbreaking text provides a much-needed link between universal design and physical education, extending boundaries as it offers physical educators a systematic guide to create, administer, manage, assess, and apply universal design for learning (UDL). Universal Design for Learning in Physical Education is for all physical educators―those who are or are preparing to become general PE teachers as well as those who are in the field of adapted physical education. This resource offers the following: Ready-to-use curricular units for grades K-12, with 31 universally designed lessons that demonstrate how teachers can apply UDL in specific content areas (teachers can also use those examples to build their own units and lessons)Rubrics for the 28 items on the Lieberman–Brian Inclusion Rating Scale for Physical Education (LIRSPE) to help teachers follow best practices in inclusionTables, timelines, and paraeducator training checklists to ensure that UDL is effectively delivered from the beginning of the school year Universal Design for Learning in Physical Education approaches inclusion from the macro level, providing a comprehensive conceptual model of UDL and how to incorporate it into curriculum planning and teaching methods for K-12 physical education. Outcomes for Universal Design for Learning in Physical Education are aligned with SHAPE America’s physical education standards and grade-level outcomes. Given that 94 percent of students with disabilities are taught in physical education settings, this text offers highly valuable guidance to general physical educators in providing equal access to, and engagement in, high-quality physical education for all students. Part I of Universal Design for Learning in Physical Education defines universal design and explains how it relates to physical education. It identifies barriers that teachers may face in adapting UDL to their programs and how to overcome these barriers. It also addresses critical assessment issues and guides teachers in supporting students with severe or multiple disabilities. Part I also covers advocacy issues such as how to teach students to speak up for their own needs and choices. Readers will gain insight into where their programs excel and where barriers might still exist when they employ the Lieberman–Brian Inclusion Rating Scale, a self-assessment tool that helps measure physical, programmatical, and social inclusion. Finally, part I reinforces several UDL principles by sharing many examples of how physical educators have applied UDL in their programs. Part II offers a trove of universally designed units and lesson plans for use across grades K-12, with separate chapters on lessons for elementary, sports, fitness, recreation, and aquatics. Universal Design for Learning in Physical Education is the first text to delve deeply into the concept of universal design in physical education. As such, it is a valuable resource for all PE teachers—both those leading general classes and adapted classes—to learn how to successfully implement universally designed units and lesson plans that enrich all their students’ lives. The accompanying web resource provides 40 forms, tables, checklists, and a sample lesson plan from the book, as well as a list of websites, books, and laws. These resources are provided as reproducible PDFs for practical use.