Abstract

We study two microwave bursts (which occurred about 12 minutes apart in the same active region) that show contrasting characteristics in morphology and spectral variation in microwave data from the Owens Valley Radio Observatory (OVRO) Solar Array and the Nobeyama Radioheliograph (NoRH). The first flare (X-ray class C2.8, 23:22 UT) shows radio morphology that changes from a single source at a low frequency (5 GHz) to a double source at high frequencies (10-17 GHz), and shows a total power spectrum that hardens in the decay phase. In contrast, the second flare (X-ray class M1.0, 23:35 UT) shows a simple, single-source morphology at 7-17 GHz. This source is located at one of the two footpoints of a small loop identified in Yohkoh/HXT maps, and its spectrum evolves in a typical soft-hard-soft pattern. We infer the trap properties of these two loops from the microwave spectral behaviors and a coronal field extrapolation from the vector magnetogram of the active region obtained from Mees Solar Observatory, along with X-ray maps obtained from Yohkoh/SXT. It is shown that the radio characteristics of the first event are consistent with the hypothesis in which Coulomb collisions dominate in a highly anisotropic loop with low ambient electron density ~ 5 × 109 cm-3. The second flare involves a small loop in which a more uniform field strength allows rapid loss of electrons by precipitation, resulting in a spectral variation mainly controlled by the energy dependence and time profile of the injection. In spite of the significantly differing decay times (~8 and ~1 minutes, respectively), very similar injection times of ~30 s are inferred from the analysis of time profiles under the above hypotheses. We therefore present a view that the largely different morphologies and the corresponding spectral variations are consequences of the differing trap properties rather than dissimilar injection properties. The low trap density inferred for the first event (~ 5 × 109 cm-3) as compared with the second event (~ 8 × 1010 cm-3) also explains why this event showed richer microwave output in spite of weaker GOES activity.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.